Context: Undertrial prisoners lodged in the Delhi’s prisons will now be granted remission based on good conduct. Earlier, only convicts were granted remission based on their conduct.
Facts related to Undertrial prisoners in India
According to the 2021National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data, undertrial prisoners (UTPs) comprised nearly 77% of the total prison population in the country.Undertrial prisoners’ population in India is estimated to be the 18th highest in the world and the third highest in Asia. Undertrials such as Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis are in disproportionate number. About 53% of undertrial prisoners are from these communities. Around 29% of undertrial prisoners are not formally literate, while 42% had not completed their secondary education.
Undertrial Prisoners
- Definition - According to 78th Report of the Law Commission of India (1979), Undertrial is a person who is in a judicial custody or remand during investigation. An undertrial prisoner is the one who has been detained in prison during the period of investigation, inquiry or trial for the offence they are accused to have committed.
- Reason behind such large number
- Poverty and illiteracy are the main reason behind such huge number of undertrials in India. Majority of them are either unable to furnish the bonds for release or are not aware about the judicial remedy to seek bail.
- Impact on rights of Individual
- Prolonged detention and delay in trial of cases not only violates the right to liberty guaranteed to every citizen, but also amounts to denial of human rights of the undertrials.
- The overuse of undertrial detention effectively ends up in punishing the people before they are convicted, and makes a mockery of their right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
- This can often increase the risk of ill-treatment and torture inside the prisons.
Article 22 (1) - Provides the arrested person the right to consult and to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.
Article 22 (2) - Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours (Excluding time of journey)
Article 21 - Speedy trial is a fundamental right implicit in the guarantee of life and personal liberty enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution.
Challenges faced by Undertrials in India
- Exposure to hardened criminals - Despite The Model prison manual recommending separate jail for undertrials, it is seldom done. Such clubbing and exposure increases the risk of turning undertrial into criminal.
- Subject to group violence - Prisons are often a dangerous place for the first-time offenders who are subjected to group violence and mishandling by the police.
- Health and safety - Overcrowded jails and lack of adequate infrastructure results into health and safety hazards for the undertrials. Most of the undertrials belong to poor socio economic background and thus exhibit poor health indices. When such people are cramped in with each other in unhealthy conditions, infectious and communicable diseases spread easily among them.
- Homosexual Abuse - Undertrial prisoners also face homosexual abuse as prisons are places where same-sex people are lodged. Resistance showed by them leads to aggravated violence on them. Sometimes they are subjected to massive homosexual gang rapes. This leads to trauma forcing them to commit suicide.
- Social Stigma against family - Due to long absence of the main bread winner, family of the under-trial prisoner many a time is forced into destitution and also faces social stigmatization. In many cases this may result into children turning towards delinquency and exploitation by others.
Stand of Higher Judiciary
- The Supreme Court in the case of Sharifbai v. Abdul Razak (1960) held that if the accused person in not produced before the magistrate within the stipulated time, then such detention will be wrongful.
- In State of Rajasthan V. Balchand alias Baliay (1977), the Supreme Court has ruled that it is not necessary to detain the accused person in court if the appearance of the accused can be secured by other means. The court also stated that bail and not jail should be the norm.
- The Supreme Court held in M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra (1978) and Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar (1979) that a procedure which does not make legal services available to an accused person who is too poor to afford a lawyer and who would have to go through the trial without legal assistance cannot be regarded as reasonable, fair and just under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It also said that a prisoner who is seeing his liberation through the court process should have legal services made available to him.
To conclude
The number of undertrials in prison can be reduced only by speeding up the trial, simplifying of the bail procedure and by periodic review of the cases of undertrials. Moreover, there should a separate prison for undertrial prisoners.















