GS Paper 2

Supreme Court Expands Scope of Public Trust Doctrine

Context: In a landmark judgment (Swacch Association v. State of Maharashtra, 2025), the Supreme Court has expanded the Public Trust Doctrine (PTD) to include artificial waterbodies, marking a significant evolution in Indian environmental jurisprudence. The case pertained to the protection and restoration of Nagpur’s historic Futala Lake, which had been deteriorating due to unchecked encroachments and pollution.

image 45

Understanding the Public Trust Doctrine

The Public Trust Doctrine is a legal principle that treats the State as the trustee of certain natural and cultural resources, such as forests, rivers, lakes, and public spaces, for the benefit of present and future generations.
Its core idea is that these resources are too vital to be privately owned or misused and must be preserved for public welfare and ecological balance.

Objectives:

  • To ensure sustainable and equitable use of environmental resources.
  • To uphold intergenerational equity — protecting resources for future generations.
  • To prevent arbitrary state actions that harm ecological assets.

Evolution:

  • Roman Law Origin: The concept stemmed from the Roman notion of “res communes” — resources like air, water, and shores belong to everyone.
  • English Common Law: The Crown held such resources in trust for the public.
  • Indian Jurisprudence: Adopted formally through M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997), where the Supreme Court ruled against leasing forest land for private use.

Constitutional Backing

The doctrine draws strength from:

  • Article 21: Right to Life includes the right to a clean and healthy environment.
  • Article 48A: Directive for the State to protect and improve the environment.
  • Article 51A(g): Fundamental duty of citizens to protect the natural environment.

Key Judgments Expanding the Doctrine

CaseYearScope Expanded To
M.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath1997Forest land and rivers
M.I. Builders v. Radhey Shyam Sahu1999Urban parks and public spaces
Intellectuals Forum v. State of A.P.2006Lakes and wetlands
Fomento Resorts v. Minguel Martins2009Coastal and beach areas
T.N. Godavarman v. Union of India1996–2022Forests and eco-sensitive zones
Swacch Association v. State of Maharashtra2025Artificial waterbodies like Futala Lake

Significance of the 2025 Ruling

  • Recognizes artificial lakes as public ecological assets.
  • Imposes a duty on urban authorities to preserve man-made waterbodies.
  • Reinforces citizen participation and public accountability in conservation.
  • Strengthens environmental governance under constitutional principles.

Conclusion

By extending the Public Trust Doctrine to artificial waterbodies, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed India’s commitment to sustainable urban ecosystems.

This judgment bridges the gap between natural ecology and human-made infrastructure, ensuring that environmental stewardship remains central to governance and justice.

China’s WTO Complaint Against India’s EV Subsidy Policy

Context: China has filed a complaint at the World Trade Organization (WTO) alleging that India’s electric vehicle (EV) and battery subsidy schemes — including the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) for Advanced Chemistry Cells — violate global trade rules.

Beijing claims that India’s policy discriminates against foreign automakers and suppliers, contrary to WTO norms of fair competition.

image 43

About the Dispute:

The complaint has been lodged under the WTO’s Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM), which prohibits subsidies contingent upon export performance or use of domestic goods over imported ones.

Allegations by China:

  1. National Treatment Violation (Article III, GATT):
    India’s local-content requirements in EV and battery subsidies allegedly favour domestic firms like Tata Motors and Ola Electric over foreign companies.
  2. Import-Substitution Subsidy (Article 3, ASCM):
    China contends that India’s benefits are tied to sourcing from domestic manufacturers — a prohibited form of subsidy under WTO rules.
  3. Market Access Barrier:
    India’s 70–100% import duty on fully built EVs discourages entry of Chinese automakers, limiting market access.

Consequences for India:

  • WTO Dispute Risk:
    If consultations fail, the WTO may establish a dispute panel, potentially ruling against India’s EV PLI scheme.
  • Trade Deficit Concern:
    India’s $99.2 billion trade deficit with China (FY 2024–25) could widen if bilateral trade relations deteriorate further.
  • Diplomatic Strain:
    The complaint could set back recent efforts to stabilise India–China ties following the 2020 Ladakh border tensions.

India’s Defence and Way Forward:

Transparent Subsidy Design:
Recast EV incentives as green-tech or R&D subsidies permissible under ASCM Article 8 (non-actionable subsidies).

Bilateral Consultation:
Engage China under the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Article 4 consultation stage to seek an amicable solution.

Strategic Diversification:
Build alliances through the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and Global Biofuels Alliance to reduce dependency on Chinese EV inputs.

Technology Localisation:
Promote domestic innovation via Atmanirbhar EV Mission 2030, public–private R&D grants, and partnerships with Japan, the EU, and the US.

WTO Norms & Principles (At a Glance):

PrincipleProvisionPurpose
MFN (Most-Favoured-Nation)Article I, GATTEqual treatment to all WTO members
National Treatment (NT)Article III, GATTNo discrimination against imports after entry
Countervailing MeasuresArticle VI, GATTCorrect trade distortion caused by subsidies
Dispute Resolution ProcessArticles 4–17Consultation → Panel → Appellate Review

Conclusion:

While India’s EV incentives aim to foster sustainability and self-reliance, they must remain WTO-compliant to avoid sanctions or trade retaliation. Balancing green industrial policy with global trade obligations will be key to ensuring both domestic innovation and international credibility.

Government Tightens Online Content Blocking Rules, Adds Senior-Level Oversight

Context: The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has amended the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 to introduce new safeguards and senior-level oversight in online content blocking under Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act, 2000.

Key Highlights of the Amendment

Who Can Now Issue Blocking Notices

Only senior officials are now authorised to issue content removal or flagging notices to platforms such as YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), and Instagram.
Authorised officers include:

  • Joint Secretary (JS) or equivalent officer at the Centre/State.
  • Director-level officers, where no JS exists.
  • DIG or above, in police departments, specifically authorised.

Each order must clearly specify:

  • Legal basis and statutory provision
  • Nature of the unlawful act
  • Exact URL/digital location of content

A monthly review of all such orders will be conducted by an officer not below the rank of Secretary (e.g., IT Secretary or State Home Secretary).

Rule 3(1)(d): The Legal Basis

Under Rule 3(1)(d) of the IT Rules, 2021, the government can flag content that violates Indian law.

If platforms fail to act, they may lose “safe harbour” protection—their legal immunity from user-generated content liability.
Such notices act as warnings, not direct takedown orders.

Why the Change Was Needed

In some states, junior police officers (like Sub-Inspectors or ASIs) had been issuing blocking notices, raising concerns of misuse and lack of accountability.
The amendment ensures that only senior officers can exercise this power, promoting transparency, due process, and uniformity across states.

Background: X vs. Government Case

Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter) had legally challenged the government’s use of Rule 3(1)(d), calling it arbitrary and unconstitutional.
The Karnataka High Court, however, upheld the government’s authority.
Officials clarified that the new amendment is not a reaction to X’s case but does address its core concern by defining clear authority and procedure.

Section 79(3)(b) vs Section 69A

ProvisionPurposeKey Feature
Section 79(3)(b)Removal of unlawful contentPlatforms lose “safe harbour” if they fail to act
Section 69ABlocking content on grounds of national security, integrity, or defenceDirect blocking by government agencies

Significance

The amendments mark a shift toward responsible digital governance, ensuring that content blocking powers are exercised with legal clarity, senior oversight, and procedural accountability.

They balance freedom of expression with the need to curb misuse and maintain lawful online spaces.

India Sends Prussian Blue Capsules to Indonesia

Context: India has supplied Prussian Blue capsules to Indonesia after Cesium-137 (Cs-137) contamination was detected in Jakarta. This humanitarian action followed an official request from Indonesia’s Ministry of Health, underscoring India’s role as a regional first responder in public health and nuclear safety cooperation.

About Prussian Blue:

  • Nature: Prussian Blue (ferric hexacyanoferrate) is a dark blue pigment and an FDA-approved oral medicine used for treating internal contamination by radioactive or non-radioactive caesium (Cs) and thallium (Tl).
  • Mechanism: It binds radioactive isotopes in the intestine, preventing absorption into the bloodstream and facilitating excretion through stool.
  • Use: It is part of the WHO Essential Medicines List and a key stockpile item in nuclear emergency preparedness.

About Caesium-137 (Cs-137):

  • Origin: A radioactive isotope produced as a byproduct of nuclear fission in reactors and weapons testing.
  • Half-life: Around 30 years, meaning it remains hazardous for decades.
  • Radiation Type: Emits beta and gamma radiation, both harmful to living tissue.
  • Health Impact:
    • External exposure can cause burns and acute radiation sickness.
    • Internal exposure increases risks of cancer and organ damage.
  • Detection & Cleanup: Radiation detectors and decontamination agents such as Prussian Blue and potassium ferricyanide compounds are used to mitigate exposure.

India’s Role and Strategic Significance:

  • Humanitarian Leadership: India’s timely delivery reflects its expanding role as a regional health and disaster relief provider, aligning with its “Neighbourhood First” and “Act East” policies.
  • Technological Capability: India maintains Prussian Blue stocks under the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) and Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) for nuclear or radiological emergencies.
  • Diplomatic Value: Strengthens India–Indonesia bilateral relations, particularly under the ASEAN-India partnership framework for regional security and health cooperation.
  • Historical Parallel: India had earlier provided medical and nuclear safety assistance to Japan and Sri Lanka under similar emergency circumstances.

Conclusion:

India’s dispatch of Prussian Blue capsules to Indonesia reinforces its commitment to regional stability, humanitarian aid, and nuclear safety diplomacy — enhancing its image as a trusted partner in crisis response and responsible scientific power in Asia.

State Mining Readiness Index (SMRI) 2025

Context: The Ministry of Mines (MoM) has released the first-ever State Mining Readiness Index (SMRI), assessing and ranking States based on their readiness and performance in the mining sector. The initiative, reported by Business Standard and Times of India, aims to encourage reforms, strengthen federal cooperation, and promote responsible mineral development across India.

image 42
Note: Map not to scale

About the SMRI

The State Mining Readiness Index is a benchmarking tool designed to evaluate States and Union Territories on their capacity to efficiently manage and develop non-coal mineral resources.

It aligns with the national goal of Atmanirbhar Bharat through enhanced domestic mineral exploration and sustainable mining.

Objectives of the Index:

  • To promote competitive federalism among States in the mining sector.
  • To encourage investment-friendly policies and attract private participation.
  • To foster sustainable and transparent mineral management.
  • To act as a performance monitoring tool for mining reforms.

Key Evaluation Parameters:

The Index evaluates States based on four key pillars:

  1. Auction Performance – Efficiency and transparency in mineral block auctions.
  2. Mine Operationalisation – Speed and success in converting auctioned blocks into operational mines.
  3. Exploration Efforts – Level of geological exploration and resource mapping.
  4. Sustainable Mining Practices – Environmental compliance, community engagement, and mine closure planning.

Ranking Highlights:

CategoryStates with High ReadinessMineral Endowment Type
Category AMadhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, GujaratMineral-rich States
Category BGoa, Uttar Pradesh, AssamModerate mineral endowment
Category CPunjab, Uttarakhand, TripuraLimited mineral endowment

Significance:

  • Enhances policy coherence between the Centre and States.
  • Promotes data-driven decision-making in the mineral sector.
  • Facilitates balanced regional development through sectoral competitiveness.
  • Supports India’s transition to a sustainable and self-reliant mineral economy.

Way Forward

  • Strengthen digital governance in mining through platforms like MCP (Mining Clearance Portal).
  • Expand geoscientific data sharing for faster exploration.
  • Integrate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics into the SMRI framework.
  • Encourage capacity building for State mining departments.

Conclusion

The State Mining Readiness Index marks a crucial step toward modernising India’s mining ecosystem. By linking performance to reforms, it encourages States to adopt best practices in mineral exploration, sustainability, and governance—building a resilient foundation for India’s economic growth.

India and FAO Celebrate 80 Years of Partnership

Context: On World Food Day 2025, India and the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) marked 80 years of partnership, highlighting India’s journey from food scarcity to self-sufficiency and global leadership in sustainable agriculture.
The collaboration symbolises India’s long-standing commitment to achieving food and nutritional security through innovation, inclusivity, and international cooperation.

image 41

India’s Achievements in Food Security:

  • Resilient Agriculture Base: Despite having less than 4% of the world’s arable land and freshwater, India ensures food self-sufficiency and price stability through efficient policies and technological advances.
  • Public Distribution & Welfare: The National Food Security Act (NFSA) guarantees subsidised food to over 800 million beneficiaries, supported by MSP (Minimum Support Price) and public stockholding systems.
  • Empowering Small Farmers: With 146 million small and marginal cultivators, India’s targeted interventions — like PM-KISAN, Fasal Bima Yojana, and Soil Health Card Scheme — form the backbone of its agri-economy.
  • Agri-Tech & Sustainability: Digital platforms like eNAM, Kisan Drone Initiative, and Millet Mission are redefining productivity, market access, and climate resilience.

About the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO):

  • Founded: 1945
  • Headquarters: Rome, Italy
  • Membership: 194 countries; operations in over 130 nations
  • Motto: Better Production, Better Nutrition, a Better Environment, and a Better Life for all
  • Role: FAO acts as the custodian for 62 indicators of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), supporting data-driven policymaking and international coordination in food systems.

India–FAO Partnership Highlights:

  1. Founding Membership:
    India has been associated with FAO since its inception in 1945, actively shaping agricultural and food policies.
  2. Post-Independence Collaboration:
    FAO’s early technical assistance supported India’s Green Revolution and development of its agricultural research institutions.
  3. Recent Initiatives:
    • Blue Ports Initiative: Promoting sustainable fisheries and coastal livelihoods.
    • Millets Promotion: Jointly led the International Year of Millets (2023) campaign to global success.
    • Climate-Smart Agriculture: Collaborative projects for resilient crop systems and biodiversity conservation.

Significance:

  • Strengthens India’s global leadership in food and nutrition governance.
  • Reinforces SDG-2 (Zero Hunger) through inclusive, sustainable agricultural models.
  • Enhances South–South Cooperation, allowing India to share best practices with developing nations.

Conclusion:

The 80-year India–FAO partnership reflects a shared vision for a hunger-free, sustainable, and equitable world. As India transitions from food security to nutrition security, this collaboration will continue to drive innovations in agriculture, climate resilience, and rural development for decades to come.

India Elected to the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC): Strengthening Global Human Rights Diplomacy

Context: India has been elected unopposed to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) for a three-year term (2026–2028).
This marks India’s seventh term on the Council, underscoring the country’s growing credibility and leadership in upholding human rights, democracy, and the rule of law on global platforms. (Source: News on Air – NOA)

image 39

Election Significance

India previously served two consecutive terms (2018–2020 and 2021–2024) and voluntarily abstained from contesting in 2025, adhering to UN guidelines that prevent members from serving more than two consecutive terms.

Being elected again for 2026–2028 reflects the international community’s trust in India’s balanced, democratic, and inclusive approach to global human rights issues.

India’s re-election is not just symbolic — it highlights the country’s consistent efforts to promote pluralism, gender equality, and sustainable development, while advocating for a fair and impartial human rights discourse that respects national sovereignty and cultural diversity.

About the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC)

  • Established: 2006 (replacing the UN Commission on Human Rights)
  • Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland
  • Composition: 47 Member States elected by the UN General Assembly for three-year terms.
  • Regional Distribution:
    • African States: 13
    • Asia-Pacific States: 13
    • Latin American & Caribbean States: 8
    • Western European & Other States: 7
    • Eastern European States: 6

The Council addresses human rights violations, conducts the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of all UN Member States, and provides a forum for dialogue and cooperation on global human rights issues.

India’s Role and Priorities at the UNHRC

India’s stance in the UNHRC is guided by the principles of non-discrimination, inclusivity, and dialogue.

As a multi-ethnic, multi-religious democracy, India emphasizes that human rights and development are interlinked, advocating for a constructive, non-politicized approach to human rights promotion.

Key areas of India’s focus include:

  • Gender Equality & Women Empowerment
  • Right to Development
  • Digital Human Rights & Data Protection
  • Climate Justice and Human Dignity
  • Combating Racial and Religious Intolerance

India also supports capacity building in developing countries and encourages dialogue-based solutions rather than coercive interventions.

Significance for India and the World

India’s election reinforces its image as a responsible global actor and a voice of the Global South in shaping a fairer human rights agenda.

At a time of increasing polarization in global governance, India’s balanced approach — grounded in democracy, pluralism, and inclusivity — strengthens the credibility of the UNHRC itself.

India–Australia Renewable Energy Partnership (REP): Powering a Sustainable Future

Context: Australia’s Minister for Climate Change and Energy recently met with India’s Minister for New & Renewable Energy to advance cooperation under the India–Australia Renewable Energy Partnership (REP).
The meeting underscored the growing convergence between both countries in developing a clean, resilient, and diversified renewable energy ecosystem.

image 38

About the India–Australia Renewable Energy Partnership (REP)

The REP is a strategic framework launched in 2024 under the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP) between India and Australia. It aims to deepen bilateral collaboration in the renewable and clean energy sector, combining Australia’s resource wealth and technology with India’s manufacturing scale and energy demand.

Objectives and Framework

  • Diversified Value Chain: REP seeks to build an integrated supply chain in solar PV, green hydrogen, and energy storage.
  • Technology & Resource Synergy: Australia provides critical minerals like lithium, cobalt, and rare earth elements, while India brings manufacturing capacity and market scale.
  • Dialogue Mechanism: A Track 1.5 Dialogue connects government officials, industries, and research bodies to convert policy intent into practical outcomes.
  • Supporting Agreements: The India–Australia Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement (ECTA) underpins REP by reducing tariffs on clean energy commodities and critical minerals.
  • Implementation: The Ministry of New & Renewable Energy (MNRE) serves as India’s nodal agency for coordination.

Key Priority Areas

The partnership focuses on eight sectors:

  1. Solar PV manufacturing and deployment
  2. Green Hydrogen production and use
  3. Energy Storage Systems
  4. Solar Supply Chain resilience
  5. Circular Economy models
  6. Two-way Investments in renewables
  7. Capacity Building and training
  8. Shared Policy Priorities for sustainable transition

Significance for India

  • ✅ Mineral Security: Expands access to critical minerals, reducing dependence on China.
  • ✅ Skill Development: The Rooftop Solar Training Academy aims to train 2,000 technicians by 2027.
  • ✅ Industrial Integration: The Green Steel Partnership will link Australian raw materials with Indian low-carbon steel initiatives.
  • ✅ Energy Targets: Supports India’s Panchamrit goals, especially 500 GW non-fossil capacity by 2030, including 280 GW solar.
  • ✅ Ethical Supply Chains: Ensures adherence to ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) norms for transparent, responsible sourcing.

Challenges Ahead

  • Downstream Gaps: Australia lacks large-scale refining capacity for minerals.
  • Regulatory Mismatch: Divergent standards complicate certification and trade.
  • Capital Competition: The U.S. and EU’s subsidy-driven clean energy policies divert investments.
  • Grid Bottlenecks: India needs stronger grid infrastructure to integrate large-scale renewables.

Conclusion

The India–Australia Renewable Energy Partnership reflects a pragmatic model of climate diplomacy — balancing growth, sustainability, and strategic autonomy.

By linking resource-rich Australia with energy-hungry India, the REP not only accelerates the clean energy transition but also strengthens the Indo-Pacific’s green economic architecture, positioning both nations as pivotal players in the global net-zero movement.

US–China Rare Earth Tensions Escalate

Context: In October 2025, China announced export curbs on 12 rare earth elements (REEs), escalating existing trade frictions with the United States. In response, the US imposed 100% tariffs on Chinese rare earth exports, effective November 1, 2025. These developments underscore the strategic importance of rare earths in critical supply chains spanning clean energy, defence, and advanced technologies.

image 36

About Rare Earth Elements

Rare Earth Elements (REEs) are a group of 17 elements, including 15 lanthanides plus scandium and yttrium. Although abundant in the Earth’s crust, they occur in low concentrations and are difficult to extract and process, making them strategically valuable.

  • Types:
    • Light Rare Earth Elements (LREEs) – more abundant (e.g. Neodymium)
    • Heavy Rare Earth Elements (HREEs) – scarcer and more critical (e.g. Dysprosium, Yttrium)
  • Applications: Widely used in EV motors, wind turbines, defence systems, electronics, and medical imaging equipment like MRI machines.
  • Global Distribution:
    • China: 61% of mining and 92% of processing (IEA 2024)
    • India: 3rd largest reserves (~6%) but <2% production (USGS 2024)

Impact on India

  1. Supply Risk:
    India imports nearly 90% of its rare earth compounds from China (DGFT 2024). Export restrictions could disrupt EV, semiconductor and defence supply chains, slowing key manufacturing sectors.
  2. Rising Costs:
    Tariffs and curbs are projected to increase input costs for electronics by 20–25% (IEA 2025), affecting both industry and consumers.
  3. Strategic Opportunity:
    With 6.9 million tonnes of REE reserves, India can expand domestic capacity through Indian Rare Earths Ltd (IREL) and the National Critical Minerals Mission (2023) to reduce import dependency.
  4. Geopolitical Leverage:
    India’s participation in the Quad Critical Minerals Partnership (2022) and the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) can help diversify global supply chains and strengthen strategic ties.

Global Consequences

  1. Supply Chain Disruptions:
    China’s dominance in processing (92%) makes global supply chains vulnerable to shocks.
  2. Price Surge:
    Following the export curbs, global rare earth prices surged by 35–40% (IEA Market Update, Sept 2025), affecting clean energy and defence manufacturing worldwide.
  3. Strategic Decoupling:
    The US, EU, and Japan are accelerating friend-shoring — relocating supply chains to trusted partners like Australia, Vietnam, and African nations under the Minerals Security Partnership (MSP).
  4. Environmental Challenges:
    Expansion of new mining hubs in regions such as Congo and Myanmar may lead to ecological degradation if not regulated under sustainable frameworks.

Way Forward

  • Diversification of Supply: Strengthen partnerships with Australia, Vietnam, and African nations under MSP to reduce reliance on China.
  • Sustainable Mining: Promote ESG-based standards through UNEP’s Global Mineral Governance Framework to ensure minimal environmental impact.
  • Strategic Stockpiles: Create rare earth reserves under the G7 Critical Minerals Agreement to stabilize supply and prices.
  • Recycling and Circular Economy: Expand e-waste recovery networks, similar to Japan’s Urban Mining Model, to recover key elements like neodymium and dysprosium from end-of-life electronics.

SC Allows Use of Green Firecrackers in Delhi-NCR

The Supreme Court has eased the earlier blanket ban on firecrackers, permitting the limited sale and use of green firecrackers in Delhi-NCR this Diwali. The decision aims to curb the illegal smuggling of traditional firecrackers while promoting less polluting alternatives.

image 35

About Green Crackers

Green firecrackers are low-emission, eco-friendly fireworks designed to reduce both air and noise pollution compared to conventional firecrackers. They were developed by the CSIR–National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) to address pollution spikes during festive seasons.

  • Legal Basis:
    The use of green crackers follows the 2018 SC ruling in Arjun Gopal v. Union of India, which banned traditional firecrackers and permitted only certified green versions.
  • Types of Green Crackers:
    • SWAS (Safe Water Releaser): Emits water vapour to suppress dust and dilute harmful gases (~30% reduction).
    • STAR (Safe Thermite Cracker): Made without potassium nitrate or sulphur, reducing emissions and noise.
    • SAFAL (Safe Minimal Aluminium): Replaces aluminium with magnesium, cutting particulate matter by ~35%.
  • Benefits:
    • Lower particulate and gaseous emissions
    • Noise levels below 125 dB
    • Reduced contribution to smog episodes
  • Concerns:
    • Still emit ultra-fine particulate matter
    • Risk of counterfeit products in the market
    • Limited public awareness and enforcement challenges

About NEERI

The National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) is a premier environmental research institute under the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Ministry of Science & Technology.

  • Founded: 1958 (as CPHERI)
  • Renamed: 1974 as NEERI
  • Headquarters: Nagpur
  • Zonal Labs: Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai
  • Mandate: R&D in environmental management, pollution control, and sustainable development.

NEERI’s innovations, including green cracker technology, align with India’s broader goals of sustainable celebrations and pollution mitigation.

Judicial Context

The Supreme Court’s recent order does not lift the ban entirely but allows the controlled use of certified green crackers. The Court has also directed state agencies to ensure strict enforcement and curb sale of counterfeit versions.

This move seeks to balance environmental protection with cultural practices, especially during festivals like Diwali, when Delhi-NCR faces severe air quality deterioration.

Way Forward

  • Enhanced public awareness campaigns
  • Strict enforcement against counterfeit products
  • Strengthening certification and supply chains
  • Promoting alternative celebration methods

India–Mongolia Diplomatic Relations

Context: During the recent state visit of Mongolian President Ukhnaagiin Khürelsükh to New Delhi, India and Mongolia signed 10 agreements, marking a new phase in their bilateral and strategic partnership. The visit reaffirmed both countries’ shared commitment to deepen cooperation in energy, defence, culture, and technology.

Key MoUs and Developments

1. Oil Refinery Project: India will finance Mongolia’s first oil refinery through a $1.7 billion Line of Credit extended via EXIM Bank. This is India’s largest overseas development partnership to date and aims to ensure Mongolia’s energy independence from imported crude.

2. Defence Cooperation: India will assist in training Mongolian armed and border security forces, and has appointed a Defence Attaché at its Embassy in Ulaanbaatar — a significant step to enhance strategic engagement and capacity building.

3. Cultural and Spiritual Bonds:

  • India will send a Sanskrit teacher to Gandan Monastery, Mongolia’s premier Buddhist centre.
  • Collaboration will begin to digitise one million ancient Buddhist manuscripts, preserving shared spiritual heritage.
  • The holy relics of Buddha’s disciples – Sariputra and Maudgalyayana – will be sent to Mongolia in 2026, symbolising deep civilisational ties.

4. Regional Collaboration: A new MoU between the Ladakh Hill Development Council and Arkhangai Province will promote cultural, academic, and tourism exchanges, fostering people-to-people connectivity across the Himalayas and the Steppes.

5. Economic and Technological Cooperation: India and Mongolia agreed to explore joint ventures in critical minerals, rare earths, clean energy, and digital technology, aligning with India’s pursuit of resilient supply chains and sustainable growth.

image 32

Background of India–Mongolia Relations

  • Diplomatic Relations Established: 1955
  • Strategic Partnership: 2015
  • Trade Volume (2024): USD 110.8 million
  • Common Link: Shared Buddhist heritage and democratic values
  • Recent Focus Areas: Renewable energy, cyber security, mining, education, and cultural exchanges

India remains Mongolia’s “Third Neighbor”, promoting stability and economic diversification beyond its two geographic neighbours, China and Russia.

Significance

  • Enhances India’s Act East and Indo-Pacific vision.
  • Strengthens energy and resource security for both nations.
  • Reinforces soft power diplomacy through cultural and religious cooperation.
  • Expands defence and regional strategic alignment in Central and East Asia.

Way Forward

Both sides aim to translate these agreements into tangible outcomes by 2030 - particularly in energy, digital innovation, and education, ensuring a mutually beneficial partnership grounded in trust, culture, and development.

Live Cases Dashboard of the Legal Information Management and Briefing System (LIMBS)

About the Live Cases Dashboard

The Live Cases Dashboard is a real-time data visualization platform that provides an instant overview of court cases involving various Ministries, Departments, and Government of India entities.

image 33

Key Features:

  • Displays all cases scheduled for hearing in the next seven days in the Supreme Court, High Courts, and other courts.
  • Offers a visual summary of live cases, pending matters, and upcoming hearings.
  • Enables data-driven decision-making and better inter-ministerial coordination.
  • Helps legal officers and officials track case progress efficiently and plan representation accordingly.

About the Legal Information Management and Briefing System (LIMBS)

LIMBS is a web-based centralized platform for monitoring court cases where the Union of India is a party. It helps streamline legal data management across ministries, ensuring consistency and efficiency in government litigation.

Background & Development:

  • Launched: Initially developed in 2016 for all Ministries, Departments, Autonomous Bodies, and Central Public Sector Undertakings (CPSUs).
  • Upgraded Version: Introduced in January 2020 with advanced analytical features and improved user interface.
  • Nodal Agency: Managed by the Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice.

Salient Features:

  • Accessibility: Available 24×7 to authorized stakeholders including nodal officers, advocates, arbitrators, and government officials.
  • Comprehensive Monitoring: Enables uploading and tracking of latest case updates, judgments, and documentation.
  • Dashboard-Based Interface: Provides a summary view of each Ministry’s or Department’s legal matters at a glance.
  • Digital Integration: Supports paperless workflows and centralized information sharing, aligning with the Digital India Mission.

Significance

  • Promotes transparency and accountability in government litigation.
  • Reduces duplication of efforts and delays in communication.
  • Enhances the institutional memory of legal cases across departments.
  • Aids in strategic legal management and minimizes financial and administrative burden on the government.