GS Paper 2

India Invokes Emergency Powers to Secure LPG Supply Amid West Asia Tensions

Context: Amid geopolitical tensions in West Asia disrupting global energy supply chains, the Government of India has invoked emergency powers to ensure adequate availability of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) for domestic consumption. The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas directed oil refineries to increase LPG production and divert additional output for household use, reflecting concerns over supply disruptions and rising fuel prices.

image 12

Impact of West Asia Conflict on Energy Supply

India’s energy security is closely tied to West Asian shipping routes.

  • Strategic Energy Route: The Strait of Hormuz, located between Iran and Oman, connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea. Nearly 20% of global oil trade passes through this narrow waterway.
  • India’s Dependence: Around 40% of India’s crude oil imports and over 80% of its LPG imports transit through this strait.
  • Price Volatility: Global crude oil prices have risen by about $20 per barrel (~30%), raising concerns about inflation and higher import bills.
  • LNG Supply Risk: Qatar supplies nearly half of India’s LNG imports, making disruptions in the region a major concern for India’s energy supply.

Emergency Order Under the Essential Commodities Act

To manage the situation, the government invoked provisions under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

  • The Ministry issued directives under the Petroleum Products (Maintenance of Production, Storage and Supply) Order, 1999.
  • Oil refineries were instructed to maximise LPG output from available propane and butane streams.
  • The extra LPG production is to be prioritised for domestic consumption to prevent shortages.

This step aims to stabilise supply and protect consumers from potential disruptions.

About Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)

  • LPG mainly consists of propane and butane, with small amounts of other hydrocarbons.
  • It is produced during crude oil refining and natural gas processing.
  • India’s LPG usage has expanded significantly through the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY), which increased LPG coverage from about 62% of households in 2016 to nearly universal access today.
  • Around 60% of India’s LPG demand is met through imports, mainly from Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

About Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)

  • LNG is natural gas (primarily methane) cooled to about –160°C to convert it into liquid form for easier transport.
  • It is shipped via specialised LNG carrier vessels and later regasified at terminals before entering pipeline networks.
  • India produces roughly 50% of its natural gas domestically, while the remaining 50% is imported, largely from Qatar.

Essential Commodities Act, 1955

The Act empowers the government to ensure the availability of essential goods at fair prices.

  • Objective: Prevent hoarding, black marketing, and profiteering during shortages.
  • Government Powers: Regulate production, supply, distribution, storage, and pricing of essential commodities.
  • Control Tools: Stock limits, licensing, price control, and movement restrictions.
  • 2020 Amendment: Certain agricultural commodities were deregulated except under extraordinary conditions such as war, famine, or severe price rise.

Conclusion

India’s emergency intervention highlights the vulnerability of energy supply chains to geopolitical disruptions. Strengthening domestic production, diversifying import sources, and improving strategic reserves remain essential for long-term energy security.

Women-Led Development in India: Driving Inclusive Growth

Context: International Women’s Day, observed every year on 8 March, celebrates women’s achievements and calls for accelerated gender equality. The first observances took place in Europe in 1911, and the United Nations officially recognised the day in 1977.

image 11

The 2026 theme – “Rights. Justice. Action. For ALL Women and Girls” highlights the need to dismantle structural barriers to equality. In India, policy discourse has shifted from “development for women” to “women-led development”, positioning Nari Shakti as a key driver of the Viksit Bharat @2047 vision.

India’s Key Initiatives for Women-Led Development

1. Gender Budgeting

The Union Budget 2026–27 allocated ₹5.01 lakh crore (9.37% of total expenditure) towards programmes promoting women’s empowerment, reflecting the government’s commitment to gender-responsive policymaking.

2. Strengthening Women’s Rights

The 106th Constitutional Amendment (Women’s Reservation Act, 2023) reserves 33% seats in Parliament and State legislatures for women, enhancing their political representation. In addition, legal reforms such as the criminalisation of instant Triple Talaq aim to safeguard women’s dignity and rights.

3. Rural Economic Empowerment

Under the Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana – National Rural Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NRLM), more than 10 crore women have been mobilised into Self-Help Groups (SHGs). The programme has also enabled over 3 crore women to become “Lakhpati Didis”, earning sustainable annual incomes of at least ₹1 lakh.

4. Technology and Innovation

The NaMo Drone Didi Scheme provides 15,000 SHGs with agricultural drones with 80% subsidy, enabling women to participate in precision agriculture and modern rural enterprises.

5. Financial Inclusion and Entrepreneurship

Women account for 68% of loans under the Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana, while the Stand-Up India scheme has supported over 2 lakh women entrepreneurs in establishing greenfield enterprises.

6. Education and Savings for Girls

The Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana has mobilised approximately ₹3.33 lakh crore in savings, promoting long-term financial security and supporting girls’ education.

Key Achievements in Women’s Empowerment

Grassroots Leadership: Women constitute nearly 50% of representatives in Panchayati Raj Institutions, strengthening democratic participation.

Educational Advancement: Female tertiary enrolment reached 2.18 crore with a GER of 30.2, while women form 53% of UGC-NET JRF scholars in STEM disciplines.

Maternal Health Improvements: Initiatives such as Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) and Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana (PMMVY) reduced India’s Maternal Mortality Ratio from 130 to 88.

Financial and Skill Inclusion: Women hold 56% of Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana accounts and constitute 45% of beneficiaries under Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) training programmes.

Leadership Milestones: In 2025, the first women cadets graduated from the National Defence Academy, reflecting expanding opportunities in defence and scientific sectors, including leadership roles in ISRO research programmes.

Conclusion

India’s transition towards women-led development marks a paradigm shift in governance. By strengthening women’s participation in politics, education, entrepreneurship, and technology, the country is harnessing the transformative potential of Nari Shakti. Sustained investment in gender equality will be crucial for achieving inclusive growth and the vision of Viksit Bharat @2047.

Divyang Sahara Yojana and Divyangjan Kaushal Yojana

Context: During a post-Budget webinar following the Union Budget 2026–27, the Prime Minister highlighted two new initiatives aimed at strengthening support for persons with disabilities (Divyangjan): Divyang Sahara Yojana and Divyangjan Kaushal Yojana. Both schemes are introduced under the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (MoSJE) to promote accessibility, dignity, and economic empowerment of persons with disabilities.

image

Divyang Sahara Yojana

The Divyang Sahara Yojana focuses on improving access to modern assistive technologies for Divyangjan so that they can live independently and participate actively in society.

Key Features

  • Affordable Assistive Devices: The scheme aims to provide advanced assistive devices such as prosthetics, mobility aids, hearing devices, and other adaptive technologies at affordable prices.
  • Support to ALIMCO: It will strengthen the capacity of the Artificial Limbs Manufacturing Corporation of India (ALIMCO) to expand manufacturing and adopt AI-enabled and advanced technologies for better assistive products.
  • Assistive Marts: Retail-style centres will be established where beneficiaries can see, test, and select suitable devices based on their specific needs.
  • Service Hubs: Existing Pradhan Mantri Divyasha–Vayoshri Kendras (PMDVKs) will be upgraded into service hubs to provide assessment, customisation, repairs, and maintenance of assistive devices.

Through these measures, the scheme aims to improve accessibility, mobility, and the quality of life of persons with disabilities.

Divyangjan Kaushal Yojana

The Divyangjan Kaushal Yojana aims to strengthen the employability of Divyangjan by providing industry-relevant skill training aligned with emerging sectors of the economy.

Key Features

  • Skill Development: The scheme focuses on equipping Divyangjan with job-oriented skills to enable dignified livelihood opportunities.
  • Target Sectors: Training will be provided in high-growth sectors such as Information Technology (IT), Animation, Visual Effects, Gaming and Comics (AVGC), Hospitality, and Food & Beverage services.
  • Digital Integration: Skill training registration will be integrated with the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (DEPwD) through the PM-DAKSH Portal, ensuring transparency and improved monitoring.
  • Industry Linkages: The programme aims to connect trained candidates with employers, thereby promoting inclusive workforce participation.

Significance

Together, these two schemes represent a holistic approach toward disability empowerment:

  • Accessibility: Provision of modern assistive devices improves independence and mobility.
  • Economic Empowerment: Skill training enhances employability and financial independence.
  • Technology Integration: Use of AI and digital platforms strengthens delivery and monitoring of welfare schemes.
  • Inclusive Development: Aligns with the government’s vision of “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas.”

By combining technological support with skill development, these initiatives aim to ensure that Divyangjan can participate more fully in India’s socio-economic growth.

Removal of the Lok Sabha Speaker: Constitutional Process and Precedent

Context: According to The Indian Express, 118 Opposition MPs have submitted a notice seeking a resolution to remove the Lok Sabha Speaker, alleging partisan conduct and denial of opportunities to raise issues of public importance. The development brings focus to the constitutional safeguards governing the office of the Speaker.

image 8

Constitutional Basis

The removal process is governed by Article 94(c) and Article 96 of the Constitution of India.

  • Article 94(c): The Speaker may be removed by a resolution passed by a majority of all the then members of the House.
  • Article 96: The Speaker shall not preside while a resolution for their removal is under consideration.

Meaning of Effective Majority

The resolution must be passed by an Effective Majority, defined as:

More than 50% of the “then members of the House”
(Total sanctioned strength – vacancies)

This is different from a simple majority or special majority.

Procedure for Removal

  1. Notice Submission
    • A written notice must be submitted to the Secretary-General of the Lok Sabha.
    • It generally requires signatures of at least two members.
  2. 14-Day Notice Period
    • A mandatory 14-day notice is required before moving the resolution (Proviso to Article 94).
  3. Specific Charges
    • The motion must clearly state the charges.
    • It must not contain arguments, inferences, defamatory remarks, or imputations.
  4. Admission of Motion
    • The motion requires the support of at least 50 members to be admitted for discussion.
  5. Presiding Officer During Debate
    • The Deputy Speaker, or in their absence, a member from the Panel of Chairpersons, presides (Article 96).
  6. Speaker’s Rights
    • The Speaker has the right to speak and defend themselves.
    • They can vote in the first instance but do not have a casting vote in case of a tie.

Historical Precedents

  • Removal notices were moved against:
    • G.V. Mavalankar (1954)
    • Hukam Singh (1966)
    • Balram Jakhar (1987)
  • Only the motion against G.V. Mavalankar was admitted and debated; it was defeated.
  • No Lok Sabha Speaker has ever been removed.

Significance

The removal provision ensures institutional accountability, while safeguards such as effective majority and structured notice protect the dignity and neutrality of the office. The Speaker plays a pivotal role in maintaining parliamentary order, certifying Money Bills, and adjudicating disqualification under the Tenth Schedule, making procedural integrity critical.

From Rules to Results: Rashtriya Karmayogi Jan Seva Programme

Context: The Rashtriya Karmayogi Large Scale Jan Seva Programme (Phase-II) has concluded under the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. Implemented by the Capacity Building Commission (CBC) under Mission Karmayogi, the initiative aims at behavioural transformation of civil servants, shifting governance from a rule-bound culture to a role-based and purpose-driven framework.

image 7

Objectives and Approach

  • Core Values: Instil Seva Bhav (spirit of service) and Svadharma (duty consciousness).
  • Governance Shift: Transition from “rule-based compliance” to “citizen-centric outcomes”.
  • Behavioural Orientation: Improve responsiveness, empathy, and accountability in public service delivery.

Implementation and Scale

  • Phase I (Jan 2025): Covered officials in Delhi NCR.
  • Phase II (Apr 2025–Feb 2026): Expanded nationwide across Central Ministries and departments.
  • Scale Achieved: Around 10.5 lakh government servants trained across India.

This marks one of the largest behavioural capacity-building efforts in India’s administrative history.

About Mission Karmayogi

Launched in 2020 as the National Programme for Civil Services Capacity Building (NPCSCB), Mission Karmayogi seeks to create a future-ready, technology-enabled bureaucracy.

Key Features

  • Digital Backbone: Learning through the iGOT Karmayogi platform, enabling “anytime, anywhere, any device” access.
  • Competency Mapping: Uses the Framework of Roles, Activities and Competencies (FRAC) to align job roles with required skills.
  • Institutional Architecture:
    • PM’s Public Human Resources Council (Apex body)
    • Capacity Building Commission (Executive body)
    • Karmayogi Bharat SPV (Platform management)
    • Coordination Unit

Achievements

  • Over 1.49 crore registered users.
  • More than 7.26 crore course completions.

Significance

  • Improved Service Delivery: Enhances quality and timeliness of citizen services.
  • Cultural Reform: Encourages innovation and proactive governance.
  • Digital Transformation: Integrates learning with governance technology.
  • Viksit Bharat 2047 Vision: Builds administrative capacity aligned with long-term development goals.

The programme represents a structural shift from static training modules to continuous, competency-based learning ecosystems.

Seven Years of SWAYATT Initiative: Promoting Inclusive Public Procurement

Context: According to the Press Information Bureau (PIB), the Government e-Marketplace (GeM) recently marked seven years of the SWAYATT initiative, underscoring its role in promoting inclusive and equitable public procurement. The initiative focuses on integrating start-ups, women entrepreneurs, youth, and small enterprises into government procurement processes.

image

About SWAYATT Initiative

SWAYATT (Startups, Women and Youth Advantage Through e-Transactions) is a flagship initiative launched in 2019 by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry (MoCI). It aims to democratise public procurement by enabling underrepresented sellers to access government markets through digital platforms.

Key Features

  • Nodal Agency: Implemented through the Government e-Marketplace (GeM).
  • Objective: Improve access to markets, finance, and value addition opportunities for smaller and emerging businesses.
  • Target Beneficiaries:
    • Start-ups
    • Women entrepreneurs
    • Youth-led enterprises
    • Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs)
    • Self-Help Groups (SHGs)

Special Digital Storefronts

To enhance visibility for smaller sellers, GeM hosts dedicated sections such as:

  • Womaniya – Promotes women-led enterprises and products.
  • Startup Runway – Enables innovative start-ups to showcase new products and technologies to government buyers.

About Government e-Marketplace (GeM)

The Government e-Marketplace (GeM) is India’s national online procurement portal used by government departments, public sector undertakings (PSUs), and organisations to purchase goods and services.

  • Launch Year: 2016
  • Purpose: Replace the earlier Directorate General of Supplies and Disposals (DGS&D) procurement system.
  • Operator: GeM Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry.
  • Digital Architecture:
    • Cashless
    • Paperless
    • Contactless platform with minimal human interface.

Regulatory Mandate

  • Rule 149 of the General Financial Rules (GFR), 2017 mandates central ministries and departments to procure available goods and services through GeM.

Transparency and Access

  • Bid Anonymity: Seller identities remain hidden until bid opening to prevent collusion.
  • Open Registration: Any legally registered business with GST and PAN can register and sell on GeM.

Significance of SWAYATT

  • Inclusive Growth: Expands economic participation for marginalised entrepreneurs.
  • Digital Governance: Uses digital platforms to reduce entry barriers in government procurement.
  • Women Empowerment: Dedicated storefronts promote women-led enterprises.
  • Startup Ecosystem Support: Enables start-ups to access government buyers and scale innovations.

By integrating smaller enterprises into the procurement ecosystem, SWAYATT strengthens India’s push toward transparent, inclusive, and technology-driven governance.

India–France “Special Global Strategic Partnership”: A New Indo-Pacific Anchor

Context: French President Emmanuel Macron is on a three-day official visit to India in 2026, marking his fourth visit. During the visit, India and France formally upgraded their ties to a Special Global Strategic Partnership, reinforcing cooperation in defence, technology, economy, and Indo-Pacific stability.

image 4

This elevation builds upon the Horizon 2047 Roadmap (2023), which focuses on Security, Planet, and People.

Key Outcomes of Macron’s 2026 Visit

1. Diplomatic & Institutional Strengthening

  • The partnership was elevated to a Special Global Strategic Partnership to deepen Indo-Pacific coordination.
  • An Annual Foreign Ministers Dialogue was institutionalised to monitor implementation of Horizon 2047 goals.

2. Defence and Military Cooperation

  • A BEL–Safran Joint Venture was launched to localise HAMMER missile manufacturing in India.
  • Reciprocal liaison officers were deployed between Indian Army and French Land Forces establishments to improve interoperability.

3. Technology and Innovation Collaboration

  • The Indo-French Centre for Digital Sciences was launched to co-develop trusted digital public infrastructure and emerging technologies.
  • India-France Year of Innovation 2026 was launched to promote R&D cooperation among startups and research institutions.

4. Skilling and Human Capital

  • A Letter of Intent was signed to establish a National Centre of Excellence for Skilling in Aeronautics.
  • France operationalised a five-year Schengen visa for Indian Master’s alumni, easing professional mobility.

5. Healthcare and Logistics

  • AIIMS Delhi will host an Indo-French Centre for AI in Health, focusing on advanced diagnostics.
  • India Post and La Poste (France) signed an LoI to modernise e-commerce logistics and digital postal services.

6. Economic and Tax Alignment

  • A protocol was signed to amend the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA), facilitating cross-border investments.

Overview of India–France Bilateral Relations

  • India’s first strategic partnership (1998) was with France, upgraded further in 2026.
  • Bilateral trade reached $15 billion (2024–25), with India maintaining a trade surplus.
  • France remains among India’s top defence partners:
    • procurement plans include 114 Rafale jets and a confirmed deal for 26 Rafale-M jets.
  • Regular military exercises: Varuna, Shakti, Garuda.
  • Digital cooperation expanded with UPI integration in France, including landmark usage at Eiffel Tower locations.
  • Space ties: ISRO–CNES cooperation includes TRISHNA satellite for climate monitoring.
  • Nuclear cooperation: Civil Nuclear Agreement (2008) and the Jaitapur Nuclear Power Project (9.9 GW).

Strategic Significance

The upgraded partnership strengthens India’s global positioning by supporting:

  • strategic autonomy,
  • multipolar world order,
  • Indo-Pacific security,
  • defence indigenisation and advanced technology collaboration.

Conclusion

India–France ties are emerging as a core pillar of India’s Indo-Pacific and strategic diplomacy, combining defence manufacturing, digital trust frameworks, innovation, and global governance coordination.

Karnataka Announces Ban on Social Media for Children Under-16

Karnataka has become the first Indian state to announce a ban on social media use for children below 16 years of age, citing concerns over mental health, online safety and algorithmic addiction. The proposal reflects growing global debates on regulating digital platforms for minors. Other states such as Andhra Pradesh and Goa are also considering similar restrictions.

image 3

However, the move raises a constitutional question because Entry 31 of the Union List places telecommunications and the internet under the Union government’s jurisdiction, potentially limiting the legislative competence of states to impose such restrictions.

Globally, Australia recently enacted the world’s first nationwide law prohibiting social media access for children under 16, signalling an emerging international trend toward stricter digital safety frameworks for minors.

Rationale for the Ban

Supporters of the proposed ban highlight several concerns regarding children's exposure to social media platforms.

First, algorithmic addiction is seen as a major problem. Many platforms use infinite scrolling and personalised recommendation algorithms designed to maximise user engagement.

These systems activate dopamine reward cycles in the brain, potentially leading to excessive usage, reduced attention spans, and behavioural dependency among adolescents.

Second, cyberbullying and online harassment have become serious issues. Anonymous digital environments enable harassment that can significantly affect children’s mental health. Studies have linked cyberbullying with rising levels of anxiety, depression, and self-harm among teenagers.

Third, sleep disruption and developmental impacts are associated with late-night device usage. Prolonged screen exposure interferes with circadian rhythms and can lead to chronic sleep deprivation, which negatively affects cognitive development, academic performance and emotional stability.

Concerns Against the Ban

Critics argue that a blanket ban may produce unintended consequences.

One major concern is privacy risk. Enforcing age restrictions would require platforms to deploy age verification mechanisms such as biometric authentication or identity verification. This could result in the collection of sensitive personal data, raising concerns about surveillance and data misuse.

Another criticism is that bans may shift responsibility away from social media companies. Instead of reforming harmful algorithms or strengthening platform safety mechanisms, companies might simply comply with age restrictions while deeper structural problems remain unaddressed.

Additionally, a blanket restriction could worsen the digital divide. Many students rely on social media groups and platforms for peer learning, collaboration, and educational resources. A universal ban may disproportionately affect children from disadvantaged backgrounds who lack access to alternative learning tools.

Existing Legal Framework

India already has legal provisions governing children’s digital safety under the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023.

The Act defines a child as any person below 18 years of age and requires verifiable parental consent before platforms can process children’s personal data. It also prohibits behavioural monitoring, tracking, and targeted advertising directed at minors.

Non-compliance can attract financial penalties of up to ₹200 crore.

Conclusion

The Karnataka proposal highlights the growing challenge of balancing child safety, digital freedom, privacy, and federal legislative authority. Rather than relying solely on bans, experts suggest a multi-layered regulatory approach combining algorithm transparency, platform accountability, digital literacy and parental oversight.

Front-of-Package Labelling: A Preventive Strategy to Address India’s Rising Lifestyle Diseases

Context: The Supreme Court has urged the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) to implement Front-of-Package (FOP) labelling to enable consumers to make healthier food choices. The Court has sought a time-bound response, highlighting concerns over regulatory delays despite earlier expert committee recommendations.

image 6

What is Front-of-Package Labelling?

Front-of-package labelling is a public health intervention that provides simplified and easily visible nutritional information on packaged foods.

It highlights high levels of sugar, salt and saturated fat, enabling consumers to quickly assess the health risks of a product. Unlike detailed back-of-pack disclosures, FOP labels are designed to influence behavioural choices at the point of purchase, especially among populations with limited awareness or time.

Need for FOP Labelling in India

India faces a growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The ICMR-INDIAB study (2023) estimates that India has over 101 million diabetics, 136 million pre-diabetics, and high prevalence of hypertension, obesity and hypercholesterolemia.

Excessive consumption of processed foods rich in sugar, salt and unhealthy fats has emerged as a major risk factor.

FOP labelling can act as a behavioural nudge to promote healthier diets, improve nutritional literacy and support preventive healthcare. It aligns with Article 47 of the Constitution, which mandates the State to improve nutrition and public health.

Impact on Consumers and Public Health

Simplified warning labels empower consumers by enabling informed and quick decision-making. Evidence from countries such as Chile and Mexico shows reduced consumption of sugary beverages and greater awareness of nutritional risks. Over time, this could reduce disease prevalence, healthcare costs and productivity losses in India.

Further, it strengthens food system transparency and consumer rights, complementing initiatives such as Eat Right India.

Impact on Food Industry

Mandatory labelling encourages product reformulation and innovation. Companies are incentivised to reduce sugar, salt and unhealthy fats to avoid negative labelling.

This can improve overall nutritional quality in the market and foster healthier competition. However, industry stakeholders have expressed concerns about compliance costs and trade implications.

Challenges in Implementation

Key challenges include resistance from the food industry, the need for culturally sensitive and multilingual labels, and ensuring regulatory enforcement.

India’s diverse literacy levels and dietary patterns require context-specific design. Public awareness campaigns and nutrition education are critical for effective adoption.

Way Forward

India should adopt a phased and evidence-based FOP framework aligned with global best practices while addressing domestic socio-economic realities.

Integration with digital platforms, school education, and community outreach can maximise impact. Strong monitoring and stakeholder engagement will ensure sustainability.

In conclusion, front-of-package labelling marks a shift towards preventive and participatory healthcare. By promoting informed consumer behaviour, corporate accountability and healthier food environments, it can play a transformative role in tackling India’s nutrition transition and advancing long-term public health goals.

Combating Hate Speech: Constitutional and Judicial Safeguards

Context: Rising instances of hate speech in India have raised serious concerns about social harmony, constitutional morality, and public order. The issue has placed the judiciary at the centre of balancing freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a) with the need to protect dignity, equality, and fraternity. Courts have repeatedly intervened to interpret existing laws and fill gaps where legislative clarity is lacking.

image 5

Hate Speech in India

Hate speech refers to speech, expression, or conduct that promotes hatred, discrimination, or hostility against individuals or groups based on identity markers such as religion, caste, ethnicity, gender, or language.

Such speech can appear in multiple forms including public speeches, written content, symbols, gestures, images, or online communication through social media platforms.

A key challenge in India is that hate speech is not explicitly defined in statutory law, creating ambiguity in enforcement. Instead, various provisions indirectly regulate such speech by focusing on public order and communal harmony.

Legal Framework Regulating Hate Speech

India regulates hate speech through a combination of constitutional provisions and statutory laws.

Article 19(2) of the Constitution allows the State to impose reasonable restrictions on free speech in the interests of public order, security of the State, and prevention of offences.

Several laws address hate speech in specific contexts:

  • Representation of the People Act, 1951 – Sections 8, 123(3A), and 125 penalise communal appeals and hate speech during elections.
  • Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 – prohibits speech that promotes untouchability or caste discrimination.
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023
    • Section 196 (earlier IPC 153A) – penalises promoting enmity between groups.
    • Section 299 (earlier IPC 295A) – punishes deliberate acts outraging religious feelings.
    • Section 353 – penalises statements likely to incite offences or disturb public order.

Supreme Court Judgements

The Supreme Court has played a crucial role in interpreting the limits of free speech.

  • Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India – The Court declined to create a new offence but directed the Law Commission to recommend a clear definition of hate speech.
  • Ramji Lal Modi v. State of Uttar Pradesh – Upheld restrictions on speech that threatens public order by insulting religious beliefs.
  • Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) – Struck down Section 66A of the IT Act, reaffirming that vague laws cannot suppress legitimate free speech.
  • Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India (2018) – Directed governments to appoint nodal officers to prevent hate crimes and mob lynching, recognising the State’s duty to protect citizens’ dignity.

Need for Stronger Criminalisation

The rise of online hate campaigns and communal mobilisation highlights the need for stronger regulation.

First, criminalisation helps protect vulnerable communities from discrimination and social exclusion. For instance, inflammatory online posts were found to have contributed to tensions during the 2020 Delhi riots.

Second, clear legal provisions can prevent violence and communal clashes by deterring provocative speech.

Third, stronger enforcement ensures accountability of both offenders and authorities, addressing gaps seen during elections or on social media platforms.

Conclusion

Hate speech threatens constitutional values of equality, fraternity, and dignity. While India possesses multiple legal safeguards, the absence of a clear statutory definition and inconsistent enforcement weaken their effectiveness. Strengthening legislation, improving enforcement mechanisms, and upholding judicial oversight will be crucial to maintaining democratic freedoms while safeguarding social harmony.

Guarding the Uniformed Pen: New MoD Publication Guidelines & the Official Secrets Act

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) is framing revised guidelines for publications authored by serving and retired armed forces personnel. The move follows controversy over an unpublished memoir by former Army Chief General M. M. Naravane that reportedly contained sensitive operational details. The proposed framework will align military publications with the provisions of the Official Secrets Act (OSA), 1923, to prevent inadvertent disclosure of classified information.

image 35

Why the Guidelines Now?

Military memoirs and analytical writings often provide valuable insights into strategy, civil–military relations and conflict management. However, disclosures relating to operational planning, intelligence assessments, troop deployment, or diplomatic negotiations may compromise national security.

The MoD seeks to institutionalise a pre-publication clearance mechanism to balance transparency with strategic confidentiality.

The Official Secrets Act, 1923: Legal Backbone

The OSA is a colonial-era law enacted to safeguard state security and prevent espionage. It evolved from the Indian Official Secrets Act of 1889, strengthened in 1904 under Lord Curzon, and consolidated in its present form in 1923.

Objective

To protect India’s sovereignty, defence establishments, and intelligence infrastructure by penalising unauthorised disclosure of classified information.

Applicability

The Act applies to all Indian citizens, including government officials and company executives, both within and outside India.

Key Provisions of the OSA

  • Section 3 – Espionage: Criminalises approaching prohibited places or collecting information useful to an enemy; punishment up to 14 years’ imprisonment.
  • Prohibited Places: Includes defence installations, arsenals, military camps, ports, and notified infrastructure.
  • Section 4 – Evidence Standard: Communication with a foreign agent can be treated as evidence of prejudicial intent.
  • Section 5 – Wrongful Communication: Penalises unauthorised sharing or retention of official documents, codes or passwords (up to 3 years).
  • Section 10 – Harbouring Spies: Punishes knowingly sheltering individuals committing espionage.
  • Section 11 – Search Powers: Magistrates may issue search warrants based on reasonable suspicion.
  • Section 12 – Cognizable Offences: Police may arrest without warrant for most OSA offences.

Implications of the New Guidelines

The forthcoming MoD framework is expected to:

  • Mandate pre-publication clearance for manuscripts by serving officers.
  • Specify redaction norms for operational or intelligence details.
  • Clarify liabilities for retired officers who remain bound by confidentiality obligations.
  • Integrate OSA compliance with modern information security standards.

While safeguarding secrecy is essential, critics argue that the OSA’s broad language may create ambiguity and discourage academic debate. The Supreme Court has previously emphasised that national security restrictions must be proportionate and narrowly tailored.

The Larger Debate

India’s strategic environment, marked by evolving threats and hybrid warfare, demands robust information discipline. At the same time, democratic accountability and informed public discourse benefit from responsible military scholarship.

The new guidelines attempt to strike this balance by ensuring that institutional memory does not translate into operational vulnerability.

Ultimately, the initiative underscores a central principle: in matters of defence, the pen carries power — and responsibility.

Towards Structured State Formation: Debate on a Permanent Reorganisation Framework

Context: A Private Member’s Bill introduced in Parliament proposes the creation of a permanent institutional framework for State and Union Territory reorganisation. The initiative seeks to replace ad-hoc and politically driven decisions with an objective, rule-based process in line with evolving governance needs.

image 23

Existing Constitutional Framework

  • Article 3 and Article 4 empower Parliament to create, merge, or alter states through a simple majority.
  • Such Bills require Presidential recommendation before introduction.
  • The concerned State Legislature is consulted, but its opinion remains advisory and non-binding.
  • This flexible mechanism enabled major reorganisations, including linguistic states in the 1950s and more recent formations like Telangana.

While this framework ensures political flexibility, critics argue it lacks transparency and institutional continuity.

Rationale for a Permanent Framework

  • Administrative Efficiency: Shifting from the earlier principle of linguistic homogeneity to modern criteria such as governance capacity, connectivity, and service delivery.
  • Institutionalisation: A permanent States and UT Reorganisation Commission could provide a data-driven, Census-based process instead of episodic political decisions.
  • Economic Viability: Mandatory financial and resource assessments may ensure new states are fiscally sustainable.
  • Sub-Regional Equity: Regions such as Vidarbha or Bundelkhand often raise concerns of neglect and uneven development.
  • Democratic Channel: Structured mechanisms may reduce violent or disruptive movements by offering legal pathways for aspirations.

Concerns and Criticism

  • Balkanisation Risk: A continuous framework may trigger multiple demands (e.g., Bodoland, Gorkhaland), potentially weakening national cohesion.
  • Inter-State Tensions: Smaller states may intensify disputes over water, power, and resources.
  • Constitutional Issues: Binding powers to a commission could conflict with Parliament’s authority under Article 3.
  • Emotional Dimensions: Identity-based demands often transcend economic or administrative logic.
  • Federal Trust Deficit: States may view a permanent Central body as intrusive, especially in politically sensitive contexts.

Way Forward

  • Comprehensive Review: Consider a Second States Reorganisation Commission for a one-time, evidence-based review.
  • Strengthen Federal Consent: Amend Article 3 to enhance the role of State Legislatures.
  • Alternative Governance Models: Use Special Development Boards, regional autonomy, and targeted funding.
  • Dialogue Platforms: Revitalise the Inter-State Council (Article 263) to manage regional grievances.
  • Eligibility Criteria: Fiscal viability and administrative convenience should be key benchmarks.

A balanced approach combining institutional clarity and political consensus can ensure that future state formation strengthens rather than fragments India’s cooperative federal structure.

Trending now

State of India’s Environment 2026: Rising Climate Risks and the Need for Resilience
Karnataka Announces Ban on Social Media for Children Under-16
India–France “Special Global Strategic Partnership”: A New Indo-Pacific Anchor
Front-of-Package Labelling: A Preventive Strategy to Address India’s Rising Lifestyle Diseases