Security

What is the National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID)?

Context: To control crime in the National Capital, Delhi Police Commissioner has authorised district deputy commissioners of police (DCPs) to start using the NATGRID (National Intelligence Grid) tool to track down suspects and criminals. 

Relevance of the Topic:Prelims: Key facts about National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID).

About National Intelligence Grid

image 150
  • NATGRID is a database compiled by the Ministry of Home Affairs that contains over 24 sets of data to help agencies identify and monitor suspects.
  • It was conceived in 2008 after the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai. 
  • The data sets include (Natgrid collects data from):
    • Immigration records, passports
    • Banking details, credit card information, PAN records
    • Travel history
    • Phone data
    • Vehicle registration data
    • National Population Register 
    • Company details etc. 

Utility

  • The data repository at NATGRID captures all the digital footprints of an individual or an entity. 
  • NATGRID offers real-time intelligence about individuals and other entities to law-enforcement authorities across the country.
  • The data is used to counter illegal activities (E.g., suspicious financial transactions, drug rackets) by sharing information with several security agencies. 

Data is utilised by

  • NATGRID services are available to 11 central agencies and police departments of all states and union territories. 
  • The eleven agencies include the Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW), Intelligence Bureau (IB), National Investigation Agency (NIA), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), Enforcement Directorate (ED), Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and Directorate General of GST Intelligence.

Criticism

  • NATGRID has faced opposition on account of possible violations of privacy and leakage of confidential personal data.
  • However, as per the government:
    • NATGRID infrastructure has adequate safeguards to prevent any unauthorised access. 
    • The data is end-to-end encrypted and can be accessed only after proper authorisation and authentication have been completed.

Note: The local police take the help of CCTNS (Crime and Criminal Tracking Network System) to probe cases. 

Read More: Criminal Tracking Network and Systems (CCTNS) 

BHARATPOL Portal

Context: The Union Home Minister has recently inaugurated the BHARATPOL portal which aims to provide police and security agencies in India with a seamless connection to INTERPOL, the international police organisation.

Relevance of the Topic: Prelims: Key facts about BHARATPOL. 

About BHARATPOL

  • BHARATPOL is a digital platform developed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
  • It integrates CBI (Nodal agency of INTERPOL in India) with State law enforcement agencies and the Centre for sharing information on fugitives and processing requests for INTERPOL notices to enhance international law enforcement cooperation, especially in dealing with transnational crimes
  • Primary purpose: To facilitate faster and paperless processing of INTERPOL notices, extradition requests, and other forms of international legal assistance.
    • Previously, Indian police had to rely on manual methods and letters to coordinate with INTERPOL and foreign agencies, leading to delays in cases related to fugitives and transnational crimes. 
    • Bharatpol eliminates these inefficiencies by offering a centralised and real-time digital platform.
image 76

Core Objective

  • Provide a Broadcast Hub for Assistance and Real-Time Action against Transnational Crimes by improving collaboration between Indian law enforcement agencies and their foreign counterparts. 
  • It integrates with INTERPOL and foreign law enforcement agencies to streamline the handling of fugitives, international investigations, and legal requests.

Components of BHARATPOL system

  • Paperless system: All INTERPOL-related processes, including notices and extradition requests, are handled digitally to reduce time delays.
  • Real-Time communication: It ensures rapid transmission of alerts, requests, and notices between Indian and international authorities.
  • Comprehensive support: BHARATPOL provides access to documents, guidelines, templates, and training resources to assist officers in drafting legal requests and conducting international investigations.

Key Features of BHARATPOL

  • Real-Time Information Sharing: BHARATPOL facilitates quicker and more efficient sharing of information among law enforcement agencies both domestically and internationally.
  • Centralised Platform: It serves as a unified platform for processing international requests related to criminal investigations, including the issuance of Red Notices and other INTERPOL notices.
  • Enhanced Collaboration: It improves collaboration between Central, State, and Union Territory Law enforcement agencies, allowing seamless communication among various police bodies.
  • Streamlined Communication: BHARATPOL replaces outdated communication methods (like letters and faxes) with digital solutions, ensuring faster exchanges between the CBI and INTERPOL liaison officers.
  • Capacity Building: The portal provides resources for training field-level officers, improving their skills in handling international investigations.

Significance for India

  • Enhances India's ability to handle transnational crimes efficiently.
  • Improves the extradition process and legal proceedings by reducing delays caused by bureaucratic hurdles.
  • Strengthens India's global cooperation in law enforcement agencies, Interpol and other international bodies.

India protests China’s New Counties in Ladakh

Context: The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has rejected China's claims on Ladakhi territory.

Major Highlights:

  • Recently, China has announced the establishment of two new counties (He'an County and Hekang County) in Hotan Prefecture of China. Parts of the jurisdiction of these counties fall in India's Union Territory of Ladakh.
  • MEA has diplomatically communicated to China that India does not accept the illegal Chinese occupation of Indian territory in this area. 
  • Also, MEA has raised concerns about China's Mega hydropower project in upstreams of Yarlung Tsangpo.
    • Yarlung Tsangpo is the chinese name of Brahmaputra river that enters India via Siang territory of Arunachal Pradesh.
image 38

About India-China Border Issue Disputes

  • China and India have had border tensions since the 1962 war, due to China's claims over Ladakh and Arunachal Prader under “Five Finger Policy”.
    • The Five finger policy was devised by China to legitimize its claims over Tibet and surrounding territories like Ladakh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh.
    • Further, in the 1962 war, China gained control over Indian territory renaming it to Aksai Chin.
    • Post war, the concept of “Line of Actual Control” (LAC) emerged, marking the patrolling points for both the nations.
  • Dokalam Issue: This issue emerged when China claimed the trijunction territory of Bhutan to articulate the geo-strategic interests in the region by risking security of the North-eastern region of India.
  • Galwan Valley Issue: In 2020, China violated the LAC to gain control over territories like Galwan valley, Daulat Beg Oldie and Shyok valley leading to clashes with Indian forces deployed in the region. After the clash both the nations are engaged in military and diplomatic dialogues to end the stand-off to achieve normalcy.

Overview of issues in India-China Relationship

  • Tail-tell borders: Lack of consensus over the borders leads to claims on territories by extending patrolling regions and changing names of territories. E.g., China unilaterally renamed 15 territories of Arunachal Pradesh in 2022.
  • Water Bomb: Development of the large dams on China side of Brahmaputra river leads to risk of a strategic water bomb to disrupt northeastern infrastructure by creating a man-made disaster.
  • Illegal settlements: China is building permanent infrastructure and illegal settlements in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh territories.
  • Trade balance: India has a high trade deficit with China posing a trade risk of dumping of goods.
  • Strategic Rivalry: China is associated with Pakistan in the CPEC project violating Indian Sovereignty and hampering strategic interests in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK).
  • Cybersecurity concerns: China is working on quantum computing that can hamper the cybersecurity of India. Also, state-sponsored hacker groups of China like APT10 or Stone Panda or Red Apollo challenge India’s cybersecurity.
image 39

Suggestions to Improve Relations

  • Consensus on border: India and China should engage in diplomatic dialogue to come up with a consensus based map of territorial claims.
  • Buffer Dam: India should construct a dam on Brahmaputra to act as a buffer against threat of China’s water bomb
  • Satellite based analysis of the illegal settlements of China and diplomatically engaging to vacate them.
  • Revitalising Border infrastructure: India should enhance all-weather connectivity in the border and promote well being by providing economic opportunities to border villages.
  • Reducing trade deficits by promoting Indian industries by Make in India and Atma Nirbhar Bharat. Also, diversification of the import basket can resolve the issue of dependency on China.

Conclusion: India-China relations are marked by persistent border disputes, strategic rivalry, and concerns like trade imbalances and cybersecurity threats. To foster stability, both nations must prioritise diplomatic dialogue, resolve territorial claims, address water resource challenges, enhance border infrastructure, and reduce trade dependency while promoting regional peace and mutual economic growth.

Race for Fighters: the IAF’s dilemma

Context: Recently, China has unveiled two stealth fighter jets which shows the technological prowess of the country. In contrast, India’s aircraft modernisation efforts are at various stages of development and not up to the mark, highlighting a gap in India’s defence preparedness.

Chinese Military Modernisation

  • Advanced Fighters: 
    • China has fielded two fifth generation fighter jets:
      • J-35: medium fighter  
      • J-20: heavy fighter. This makes China the only country other than the U.S. with more than one fifth generation fighter. 
    • China unveiled two stealth fighter jets in tail-less configuration (speculated to be sixth gen-fighters)
      • One is a massive jet with delta-wing design & three engines, indicating long range capability. 
      • Second is a smaller twin-engine design with swept wings.
  • China’s Air Force and Naval Aviation together constitute the largest aviation force in the Indo-Pacific region with over 1,300 fourth-generation fighters. They are equipped with technology comparable to the U.S. standards. 
  • Collaboration: Pakistan has approved the procurement of 40 J-35s (fifth generation) from China.

India’s Aircraft Fleet:

  • Indian Air Force (IAF) has 31 fighter squadrons as against the sanctioned strength of 42 squadrons, significantly below the optimal readiness requirements.
    • Of the current 31 squadrons, the phase out of two MIG-21 squadrons has been extended due to the delayed deliveries of LCA-Mk1A. 
  • IAF has acquired 36 Rafale (4.5 generation aircraft) from France through a government-to-government deal in 2016.
  • India lacks a 5th generation fighter aircraft with no prospects of its induction, for at least a decade.
image 20

India’s Modernisation Plans

  • Ambitious Acquisitions:
    • India plans to acquire over 500 fighter jets, primarily indigenously designed and manufactured. 
  • Key Projects:
    • LCA-MK1A (Tejas): Indian Air Force has placed an order of 83 units of LCA-MK1A with Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL). A deal for 97 additional Mk1As is under discussion.
      • Their delivery has been delayed due to supply chain issues with the F-404 engines by General Electric (GE)
      • The HAL Tejas is an indigenous single-engine 4th-generation multirole light fighter aircraft, developed by the Aeronautical Development Agency and manufactured by HAL. 
  • LCA-MK2 (Tejas 2): Production of the LCA Mark 2 combat aircraft is expected to start in 2029-2030.
    • LCA Mark 2 is a 4.5 generation Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft, an improved version of LCA Tejas fighter jet. 
    • It would be powered by GE-414 engine (a high-performance afterburning turbofan engine).
    • IAF plans to have about six squadrons of Tejas Mk2.
  • AMCA MK-2 (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft): The AMCA Mk2 is expected to go into mass production only after the year 2035.
    • AMCA-Mk2 is a 5th generation stealth fighter. It is currently the only 5th generation fighter under development in India.
  • Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter (TED-BF) for Navy:
    • The first prototype of TED-BF could make its maiden flight by 2026 and be ready for production by 2031.
    • TEDBF will serve as a replacement for the aging fleet of MiG-29Ks and is designed to meet the Navy's specific requirements.
  • Procurement of 114 Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA):
    • The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has recently revealed its intent to conduct an open tender for the Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) project, aiming to procure 114 jets for the Indian Air Force (IAF).

Challenges in India’s Aircraft Modernisation:

  • Delay in Acquisitions:
    • Delayed deliveries of LCA-Mk1A and LCA-MK2 (Tejas 2).
    • AMCA Mk2 (5th gen aircraft) will take a decade to be operational. 
  • Squadron Shortfalls:
    • The IAF is down to a mere 31 fighter squadrons against a sanctioned strength of 42.
    • This number will go down further when the last two remaining squadrons of the MiG-21s are phased out by the end of 2025.
    • Jaguars, Mirage-2000s and MIG-29s will begin to phase out between 2030-2035.
    • Even with the LCA-Mk1A, LCA-Mk2 and the MRFA, IAF will still be at 35-36 squadrons by 2035.
  • Dependence on Foreign Engines:
    • India is dependent on imported engines, directly or ‘co-manufactured’ to power all indigenous jets and helicopters. E.g., License manufacturing for the F-414 engine (from the US) or the new 110KN engine (from France) makes India dependent on these countries for the most critical parts.
    • India cannot claim to be fully self-reliant till it can field an aero-engine that is completely designed and developed in the country. 

Are Manipur militants using Starlink devices?

Context: Recently, the Indian Army and Manipur police seized weapons that looked like a Starlink-branded satellite router and antenna, during a search operation in multiple districts of Manipur. 

Amid the controversy, Elon Must has refuted the claims and said that the beams of Starlink satellites are turned off over India. 

What is the Starlink controversy in Manipur?

  • Among various guns and ammunition seized by the Indian Army in Manipur, a small satellite device and a router with the SpaceX logo was found. The devices were potentially smuggled from Myanmar.
  • The Starlink device had ‘RPF/PLA’ written on it, which refers to the People's Liberation Army of Manipur. (It is a Myanmar-based Meitei ethnic group that demands a separate nation)
  • Despite being restricted in India, the discovery of these devices raise concerns about the possibility of usage of satellite-based communication devices by militants in India as well as illegal international trade.

Also Read: What Manipur Needs? 

Indian laws for Satellite Communication:

  • India has strict restrictions and regulations for use of satellite-based communication devices, even by citizens in conflict-free zones. 
  • Under Section 6 of the Indian Wireless Act and Section 20 of the Indian Telegraph Act, use of thuraya/iridium satellite phones is illegal in India.
  • Even key satellite-based emergency features on premium phones that are easily available for overseas users, are not enabled for use in India.
  • These restrictions are in place to combat militancy and terrorism.
image 159

What is the Starlink Project?

  • Starlink is a SpaceX project.
  • Launched in 2019, it aims to build a broadband network that can provide high-speed global internet access, particularly in remote and underserved areas with a cluster of thousands of orbiting satellites.
  • The Starlink satellites will be placed in an altitude range between 350 km - 1,200 km in Low Earth Orbit (LEO).
  • As of 2024, the constellation consists of over 7000 satellites.  
  • Features: High speed, low latency. 
  • Starlink’s status in India:
    • India has not yet cleared an application by Starlink to offer satellite-based communication services in the country. 
    • Its application is pending security approvals from the Ministry of Home Affairs.

What is Siliguri Corridor?

Context: The Home Minister of India addressed the 61st raising day of Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) recently and said that the presence of Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) in Siliguri Corridor comes as an assurance to the entire country.

Relevance of the Topic: Prelims: Location and Significance of Siliguri Corridor. 

About Siliguri Corridor

  • The Siliguri corridor (also referred to as the Chicken’s Neck) is a narrow strip of land in West Bengal that connects the Northeastern States to the rest of the country. 
  • The area has a width of about 20 km and length of 60 km and is not far away from China. 
Siliguri Corridor

Importance:

  • Connectivity: The Siliguri Corridor is the only land route connecting the eight northeastern states of India—Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, and Tripura—to the Indian mainland. All land transportation between these states and the rest of India passes through this corridor.
  • Military Significance: The corridor is crucial for national security as it allows for the movement of military personnel and supplies to sensitive areas near international borders with China and Bangladesh. Control over this corridor is essential for India's defense strategy, especially considering increasing tensions with China and unstable Bangladesh.
  • Economic Role: The Siliguri Corridor facilitates trade and commerce not only within India but also with neighboring countries like Nepal and Bhutan. It is a key route for transporting goods between these regions, contributing to local economies.

Telecommunications Rules 2024

Context: The Union Government has recently notified the Telecommunications (Procedures and Safeguards for Lawful Interception of Messages) Rules, 2024 empowering some enforcement and security agencies to intercept phone messages under certain conditions. These rules supersede rule 419A of the Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951.

Relevance of the Topic: Prelims- Key aspects of Telecommunications Rules 2024. 

Background: 

  • The Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951 are a set of regulations established under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, governing the operation and usage of telecommunication services in India.
  • It includes provisions for message transmission, interception in specific situations, and defining the responsibilities of both service providers and users.
  • A key aspect of the rules is the ability for authorised government agencies to intercept communications under certain emergency and security situations (Section 419A).

Key provisions of Telecommunications Rules, 2024:

  • Authorised authorities: The Union Home Secretary and the Chief Secretary of each state are designated as the competent authorities to order message interceptions. In urgent situations, officers of Joint Secretary rank or Inspector General (IG) level can issue interception orders without prior approval, but they must submit these orders for confirmation within three working days.
  • Operational flexibility: The rules allow interception in "remote areas or for operational reasons" without requiring prior authorization from the competent authority, a significant relaxation from previous stipulations that mandated interception only in "emergent cases".
  • Confirmation requirement: Any interception order issued must be confirmed by the competent authority within seven working days. If not confirmed, any intercepted messages cannot be used for any purpose, including legal evidence.
  • Record Management: Agencies are required to destroy records related to interceptions every six months unless they are needed for ongoing investigations or court orders in order to maintain confidentiality and limit the misuse of intercepted data.

Differences from previous regulations: 

  • Relaxation of interception conditions: The previous requirement that interceptions could only occur in "emergent cases" has been removed. This change allows for broader circumstances such as situations where it is not feasible to obtain prior orders in remote areas or due to operational reasons.
  • Limitation on authorised officers: Previously under Rule 419A, there was no cap on the number of officers at the IGP level who could authorize interceptions, but now, only one second senior-most officer can be authorized alongside the head of the agency.
  • Consequences of non-confirmation: Under the new rules, if an interception order is not confirmed within seven days, any messages intercepted during that period cannot be utilized for any purpose such as evidence in court.

Concerns raised

There are concerns regarding privacy and accountability.

  • Potential for misuse: Critics argue that the broad grounds for interception could lead to abuses of power by authorized agencies.
  • Silent about punitive measures: There are no clear punitive measures outlined for unauthorized interceptions conducted before confirmation.
  • Vague terminology: Terms such as "public order" and "friendly relations with foreign States" are seen as overly broad and potentially subject to misuse against political opponents or activists under the guise of national security.

Protected Area Permit

Context: The Protected Area Permit (PAP) has been reinstated in the Myanmar-bordering states of India, namely, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, following security concerns, particularly influx of illegal migrants from neighbouring countries. 

Relevance of the Topic: Prelims: Protected Area Permit System; Inner Line Permit 

Protected Area Permit System

  • Protected Area Permit is a special permit required by foreign nationals to visit certain areas in India deemed sensitive due to their proximity to international borders.
  • Protected Areas:
    • Whole of Arunachal Pradesh 
    • Whole of Manipur 
    • Whole of Mizoram 
    • Whole of Nagaland 
    • Whole of Sikkim (partly in Protected Area and partly in Restricted Area) 
    • Parts of Himachal Pradesh 
    • Parts of Uttarakhand
    • Parts of Jammu & Kashmir 
    • Parts of Rajasthan 
  • A foreign national is not normally allowed to visit a Protected Area unless the government is satisfied that there are extraordinary reasons to justify such a visit.

Related Regulations:

1. Foreigners (Protected Areas) Order, 1958

  • All areas falling between the Inner line and the International Border of the State have been declared as Protected Areas.
  • Under the PAP system, foreigners must obtain permits to visit these states, as mandated by the Foreigners (Protected Areas) Order, of 1958.

2. Foreigners (Restricted Areas) Order, 1963

  • It specifies certain regions as restricted areas (such as Andaman & Nicobar Islands and parts of Sikkim), which require a Restricted Area Permit for foreign nationals. 

3. Inner Line Permit (ILP): 

  • It is a travel document that must be availed by Indian Citizens (domestic tourists) to visit these Protected and Restricted Areas of the ILP states, for a limited period.
  • ILP States: Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Mizoram and Manipur. 

Note: ILP is required by Indian citizens, whereas PAP is required by foreign nationals for entry into these designated areas. 

image 9

Case of Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland:

  • In 2010, PAP had been relaxed for Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland for boosting tourism. However, even then certain restrictions continued. For instance, citizens and foreign nationals of Afghanistan, China and Pakistan origins still needed prior approval from the Ministry of Home Affairs for entry into these states.
  • The current scenario of influx of illegal immigrants from bordering countries necessitated the reimposition of Protected Area Permit.  

How can Foreign nationals visit Protected Areas?

  • Every foreigner, except a citizen of Bhutan, who desires to enter and stay in a Protected Area, is required to obtain a special permit from a competent authority delegated with powers to issue such a special permit to a foreigner, on application.
  • If powers have not been delegated to any subordinate authority by the Government of India, the application for special permit should be referred to the Ministry of Home Affairs for prior approval (at least eight weeks before the date of the expected visit).

Criminal Tracking Network and Systems (CCTNS)

Context: Nearly 15 years after Criminal Tracking Network and Systems (CCTNS) was launched, all 17,130 police stations in the country have been linked through the CCTNS. 

Relevance of the Topic: Prelims: Key facts about Criminal Tracking Network and Systems (CCTNS). 

Criminal Tracking Network and Systems

  • CCTNS is a centralised online platform to file First Information Reports (FIRs), chargesheets, and investigation reports. 
  • This online database can be accessed by law enforcement authorities across the country.
AD 4nXdlXB IgGeNQRijXnZ5mvjiv9e6I4e0aX90a5z3kyZIwWj

Background:

  • It was conceptualised by the Ministry of Home Affairs and has been implemented as a "Mission Mode Project (MMP)" since 2009.
  • It aims at putting in place a comprehensive and integrated system for enhancing efficiency and effectiveness of policing at the police station level throughout the country.
  • National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB) is the nodal agency and is entrusted with the responsibility for monitoring, coordinating and implementing the CCTNS project.

Utility of CCTNS:

  • Creating a citizen friendly and transparent Police functioning by automating the functioning of Police Stations.
  • Improve delivery of citizen-centric services through effective usage of ICT.
  • Providing tools, technology and information to the Investigating Officers to facilitate effective and efficient investigation of crime and detection of criminals.
  • Improve Police functioning in various areas such as Law and Order, Traffic Management etc.
  • Facilitate Interaction and sharing of Information among various police agencies and jurisdictions.
  • Assist Police Officers in better management of the Police Force.
  • Keep track of the progress of Cases, including in Courts.
  • Reduce manual and redundant Records keeping.
About National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB):
NCRB was set-up in 1986 (under Ministry of Home Affairs) to function as a repository of information on crime and criminals so as to assist the investigators in linking crime to the perpetrators.Headquarters: New Delhi Its creation was based on the recommendations of the Tandon Committee, National Police Commission (1977-1981) and the MHA’s Task force (1985).In 2017 it launched the National Digital Police Portal. It is a master police portal which caters both to the citizens as well as to the police personnel. It allows police personnel to search for a criminal / suspect on the CCTNS database, besides access to many other police utilities like Cri-MAC, NDSO, CyTrain etc. To citizens, it provides various services like filing of complaints online and seeking antecedent verification of tenants, domestic helps, drivers etcThe Bureau has been entrusted to maintain the National Database of Sexual Offenders (NDSO) and share it with the States/UTs on a regular basis. NCRB has been designated as the Central Nodal Agency to manage the ‘Online Cyber-Crime Reporting Portal’ through which any citizen can lodge a complaint or upload a video clip as an evidence of crime related to child pornography, rape/gang rape.NCRB compiles and publishes National Crime Statistics i.e. Crime in India, Accidental Deaths & Suicides and also Prison Statistics.The Central Finger Print Bureau under NCRB is a national repository of all fingerprints in the country.

Practice MCQ:

Q. With Reference to Criminal Tracking Network and Systems (CCTNS), consider the following statements

1. It is a centralised repository of crime related data exclusively developed for the Intelligence bureau and CBI.

2. National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB) is the nodal agency entrusted with the responsibility for monitoring the project.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only

(b) 2 only

(c) Both 1 and 2

(d) Neither 1 nor 2

Answer: (b)

Research Security should be a National Priority

Context: As India aims to achieve its development objectives by 2047, the government has heavily emphasised on the role of science and technology in strategic and emerging sectors. However, the intensification of research and development (R&D) poses threats to Research Security.

Relevance of the Topic: Mains: Need to promote Research Security. 

What is Research security?

  • Research security refers to safeguarding scientific research from threats to confidentiality, economic value, or national interest. These threats include:
    • Foreign interference
    • Intellectual property theft
    • Cyberattacks and Insider threats
    • Espionage and unauthorised access to sensitive information.

Need to safeguard Scientific Research:

  • Identify threats emerging from collaboration: Indian universities and industries are increasingly collaborating with foreign entities. Collaboration and the free exchange of knowledge are fundamental to scientific progress, but they pose aforementioned threats to scientific research.
  • Protect investments in critical technology: India is ramping up investments in strategic technologies which include space, defence, semiconductors, nuclear technology, cybersecurity, biotechnology, clean energy, artificial intelligence, and quantum technology. If the threats are not identified or left unaddressed, they could undermine India’s progress in strategic sectors and risk its investments. 
  • Protection from increasing cyber-security attacks: India ranked 5th in global data breaches in 2023 with 5.3 million leaked accounts. Any breach of security could compromise national interests, delay technological advancements, and expose sensitive data to exploitation by foreign actors. 

 Hence, India needs to ensure that its strategic research outputs remain protected. 

Global Instances of Research Security breaches:

There have been several cases of research security breaches around the world with serious consequences.

  • A senior professor at Harvard University, the US (who received funding from the U.S. Department of Defense) was arrested for not-disclosing their links to Chinese funding. 
  • COVID-19 vaccine research facilities were subject to cyber attacks in 2020 to steal sensitive vaccine research and development data. 
  • The European Space Agency (ESA) has also suffered several cyberattacks to sabotage or steal sensitive information.

Global Initiatives for Research Security:

Such incidents have prompted several countries to develop policies and guidelines to strengthen research security. 

  • US: The US CHIPS and Science Act has several provisions on research security. They are complemented with the research security framework of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 
  • Canada: Canada has come up with National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships and a Policy on Sensitive Technology Research and Affiliations of Concern, along with a list of sensitive technologies. It has identified research institutions (primarily from China, Iran, and Russia) with which collaborations should be avoided. 
  • EU: European Space Agency has developed a partnership on cybersecurity with the European Defence Agency on cybersecurity.
  • China: Working on a military-civil fusion plan to share strategic research and technologies between the civilian and military sectors.

Way Forward to promote Research Security in India: 

  • Systematically map the security vulnerabilities in India’s research ecosystem. This would involve:
    • Understanding the nature of foreign influence in our universities
    • Assessing the vulnerabilities of key research labs and sensitive research infrastructure
    • Analysing foreign collaborations and funding in strategic technologies
    • Reviewing the personnel hiring and access control practices to comprehend possible insider threats in the crucial research facilities. 
  • Develop Institutional Framework: The Anusandhan National Research Foundation should set up a special research security office, similar to one in the U.S. National Science Foundation.
    • It can help develop a framework for research security that minimises overregulation while safeguarding important research areas. 
    • It can become a focal point for coordinating and synergising efforts for research security among security agencies and academic institutions. 
  • International Collaborations: Foster engagement with trusted international partners could be explored for the initial capacity building and awareness-raising in this area. 
  • Increase investments in strengthening the cyber security framework to protect critical infrastructure and business ecosystems.
    • The Union Budget of India (2024-2025) allocated ₹759 crores for cybersecurity projects, which was an increase from the past, but is very low. 
    • Developed economies allocate separate funds for cyber security purposes, and India should consider 1% of its GDP is spent on cyber security. 

Science is inherently international and collaborative in nature and international collaborations are crucial drivers of scientific progress. We need to find a balance between open science (which includes sharing of research infrastructure, open data, and involving the general public in the scientific research) and ensuring Research Security. Only this would guarantee that research is "as open as possible, as closed as necessary.” and build an innovation ecosystem to harness the transformative power of these technologies. 

Illegal immigration and National Security

Context: The Jharkhand High Court has directed the state government to identify illegal Bangladeshi immigrants in the Santhal Parganas region after a PIL raised concerns about demographic changes due to ‘Bangladeshi infiltration.’ The petition noted a significant demographic shift in six districts, with the tribal population decreasing from 44.67% in 1951 to 28.11% in 2011, while the minority community's percentage rose from 9.44% to 22.73%.

Illegal immigrants from Bangladesh: 

  • Illegal migration and cross-border activities pose significant challenges along the India-Bangladesh border, which is highly porous.
  • The border spans 4,096.7 km, with 3,145 km already secured by physical fencing, while the remaining sections are planned to be covered by a combination of physical and technological barriers.
  • The Home Ministry's 2021-22 annual report highlights that the porous nature of the Indo-Bangladesh border has made it difficult to control illegal migration and other cross-border activities.
  • Assam and West Bengal, which share a porous border with Bangladesh, are particularly affected by illegal infiltration.

Who are ‘Illegal Immigrants’?

  • An illegal immigrant in India is defined as a foreigner who has either entered the country without valid documents or overstayed beyond the permitted time under the Citizenship Act, as amended in 2003.
  • Such individuals are ineligible for citizenship by registration or naturalization and may face imprisonment for 2-8 years and fines.
  • However, an exception was made in 2019 for minority communities from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan who fled to India due to religious persecution or fear of it. These individuals are not considered illegal migrants and remain eligible for citizenship.
  • The 2001 Indian Census provides data on migrants, with Bangladeshis being the largest group, followed by Pakistanis, though it does not specifically categorize illegal immigrants. 

Reasons for influx of Illegal Immigrants from neighbouring regions: 

1. Economic opportunities: Neighbouring countries like Bangladesh, Nepal, and Myanmar face poverty and unemployment, pushing people to seek better livelihoods in India. India's larger economy offers better job opportunities, especially in informal sectors. 

2. Political instability:

  • The 2021 military coup and ethnic conflicts in Myanmar forced thousands of Rohingya and other minorities to flee to India. The UN estimated nearly 18,000 Rohingya refugees in India by 2021. The Civil War (1983-2009) led to over 100,000 Tamil refugees entering India, many illegally. The Taliban's takeover in 2021 prompted many Afghans to seek asylum in India.

3. Religious and ethnic persecution: 

  • Religious minorities, especially Hindus, have faced persecution, leading to migration to India. The Citizenship Amendment Act (2019) responded to this, with over 25,000 Pakistanis seeking Indian citizenship between 2016-2019.

4. Environmental factors: 

  • Climate change and environmental degradation, especially in coastal areas, drive migration. The Sundarbans region has seen significant displacement due to rising sea levels, leading to an influx into West Bengal.

5. Lack of stringent border controls: 

  • India's borders with Bangladesh, Nepal, and Myanmar are porous. These border regions traverse a range of natural landscapes which are hard to monitor, making illegal crossings easier. India has an easily navigable sea route with Pakistan as well as Sri Lanka making it vulnerable to a continuous threat of an influx of illegal migration. 

Preventing the entry of illegal migrants into India is important as they impose pressure on citizens and pose a security threat, especially in sensitive areas such as Jammu and West Bengal

Threats to India’s National Security: 

The large influx of illegal immigrants in different parts of India has raised both direct and indirect threats. 

Direct threats

  • Radicalization and infiltration:
  • The large influx of illegal immigrants, especially from regions with ongoing conflicts or extremist activities, increases the risk of radicalization. Terrorist organizations can exploit refugee movements to infiltrate operatives into the country.
  • Indian security agencies have reported that some Rohingyas, who may sympathize with militant ideologies, could be active in areas like Jammu, Delhi, Hyderabad, and Mewat, posing a potential threat to internal security.
  • Intelligence reports have indicated that Pakistan-based terror groups have attempted to infiltrate operatives into India under the guise of migrants from Bangladesh.
  • This not only poses a direct threat to internal security but also strains India’s relations with neighbouring countries.
  • Political and cultural threats:
    • The demographic change due to the influx of illegal immigrants threatens the political and cultural pre-eminence of local populations.
    • In states like Assam, the continuous influx of immigrants from Bangladesh has altered the demographic balance, leading to tensions between the indigenous population and the newcomers.
    • The Assam Accord of 1985, which sought to address these concerns, highlights the long-standing issue of illegal immigration and its impact on the socio-political fabric of the region.
    • The unchecked influx of undocumented immigrants poses a serious threat, potentially sparking power struggles between foreign anti-national groups and the indigenous populace.
    • Infiltration of Myanmar Kuki-Chins has previously ignited the Naga vs. Kuki conflict (1992 – 1999), Kuki vs. Paite (1997–1998) in Manipur, and the Kuki vs. Karbi clash (2003 – 2004) in Assam.
  • Militancy: 
    • Ongoing attacks against Muslims perceived as illegal migrants in Assam have contributed to radicalization within some segments of the Muslim community.
    • This has led to the emergence of militant groups, such as the Muslim United Liberation Tigers of Assam (MULTA), posing a significant threat to national security.
  • Law and order disruption:
    • Illegal migrants undermine the rule of law and national integrity by engaging in activities such as obtaining identity documents illegally, involving in trans-border smuggling of arms. 

Indirect threats: 

Resource strain: 

  • The arrival of large numbers of illegal immigrants can strain local resources, including land, water, and public services.
  • This often leads to resentment among the local population, who feel that their opportunities are being usurped.
  • For instance, in urban areas like Delhi and Mumbai, the presence of illegal immigrants has contributed to overcrowding and increased competition for jobs, leading to a decline in wages and working conditions.
  • According to a 2022 report by the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), regions with high concentrations of illegal immigrants have witnessed a significant drop in wages for unskilled labor.

Social instability and crime:

  • The lack of opportunities and the prevailing sense of insecurity among the local population can cause social instability.
  • Illegal immigrants, often living in poverty and deprivation, may become vulnerable to crime, both as victims and perpetrators.
  • Terror outfits can easily exploit these vulnerabilities, recruiting individuals by promising better prospects and livelihoods.
  • The Bodoland violence in 2012, which was partly fuelled by concerns over illegal immigration and its impact on local communities.
  • In the northeastern states of India, where illegal immigration is a significant issue, there has been a noticeable rise in crime rates, including human trafficking and smuggling, as reported by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) in 2023.

Grievances over resource distribution:

  • The situation in Assam's border districts, where illegal settlements have encroached on forest and agricultural land, has led to frequent clashes between the indigenous communities and the immigrants.
  • The 2019 National Register of Citizens (NRC) exercise in Assam was an attempt to address these grievances but also highlighted the deep divisions and challenges in resolving the issue.

The cumulative impact of these direct and indirect threats can lead to broader regional and national instability.

India's strategy to address these threats: 

Strengthening border security: 

  • India has invested in extensive border fencing and surveillance systems to control illegal crossings. The construction of the India-Bangladesh border fence, which spans over 4,000 kilometers, aims to deter unauthorized movement. As of 2023, approximately 3,200 kilometers of the fence have been completed.
  • The Comprehensive Integrated Border Management System (CIBMS) project leverages technology for enhanced border monitoring.
  • Efforts to improve border security also include the construction of border roads to enhance communication and mobility in these areas.
  • In addition, floodlights have been installed along significant portions of the border in West Bengal, Meghalaya, Assam, Mizoram, and Tripura. 
  • The BSF plays a crucial role in patrolling and securing India's borders. For example, in 2022, the BSF apprehended over 2,000 individuals attempting to cross the India-Bangladesh border illegally.

Legal and policy frameworks: 

  • National Register of Citizens (NRC): The NRC is a government initiative to identify and document citizens and illegal immigrants. The most notable application was in Assam, where the NRC was updated to exclude illegal immigrants. The 2019 NRC list excluded over 1.9 million individuals, although this process faced criticism and legal challenges.
  • Foreigners Act of 1946: This act regulates the entry and stay of foreigners in India. It empowers the government to detain and deport illegal immigrants. Recent amendments and stricter enforcement have aimed to enhance its effectiveness.

Diplomatic cooperation: 

  • India has worked with Bangladesh to address illegal immigration through bilateral agreements. The 2015 Land Boundary Agreement (LBA) resolved border disputes and facilitated the exchange of enclaves, which has helped reduce illegal movement.

Challenges in managing national security threats from illegal immigration: 

1. Operational:

  • The extensive and challenging-to-monitor borders with Bangladesh (4,096 km) and Myanmar (1,643 km) have gaps despite efforts like border fencing.
  • The Border Security Force (BSF) struggles with limited resources and the need for advanced surveillance technology.
  • Inefficient coordination between central and state agencies hampers effective border management, leading to gaps in enforcement.

2.Legal:

  • The Foreigners Act and Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) create a complicated legal environment.
  • The CAA has faced protests and legal issues, complicating its implementation.
  • Balancing national security measures with human rights, as seen with the CAA, leads to criticism and protests.

Recommended strategies for dealing with the issue: 

A comprehensive national policy for effective border management is urgently needed. This policy should be formulated by national security experts and tailored to address the unique challenges faced by each border region of the country.

1. Enhancing border security:

  • India can invest more in high-tech solutions like drones, infrared sensors, and AI-based monitoring systems. Expanding and better equipping the BSF and other border agencies can help close existing security gaps. 

2. Reforming legal framework:

  • India needs a more transparent and consistent legal framework to define and categorize illegal immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers. Ensuring that security measures do not infringe upon human rights is crucial. 

3. Coordination between Central and State agencies:

  • Establishing a unified command structure for border management could enhance coordination.
  • The European Union’s Frontex agency exemplifies how centralizing border management can improve coordination across multiple states.
  • Regular joint training programs for central and state agencies can foster better coordination. 

4. Counter-terrorism measures:

  • Strengthening intelligence sharing between central and state agencies, and with international partners, can help detect and prevent radicalization.
  • Developing programs to engage with migrant communities and address grievances can reduce the risk of radicalization. 

5. Strengthening diplomatic cooperation:

  • Strengthening and expanding bilateral agreements with neighbouring countries for better border management and repatriation processes is essential.
  • For example, India could model agreements on the U.S.-Mexico bilateral cooperation on border security, which includes joint initiatives and intelligence sharing.
  • Regional forums like the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) could improve collective responses to illegal immigration and security challenges, as Counter-Terrorism and Transnational Crimes are in its list of priority sectors of cooperation. 

Recent Trends of Terrorism in Jammu & Kashmir

Context: There has been increasing trend of terrorism in the Jammu region of UT of J&K in the recent past. 

Changes in terrorism landscape of Jammu & Kashmir 

  • Broad declining trend in terrorism in J&K: According to Union Home Ministry, between 2017 and 2022 there has been broad decline in terror related incidents in the region. This is reflected by following data: number of infiltrators has fallen from 53 to 14, civilians killed from 55 to 31 and terrorist-initiated incidents from 228 to 125.
  • Widening in the geography of terrorism to include Jammu region: In recent times, there has been a broader shift of terrorist activity across the Pir Panjal range to the Jammu region from the Kashmir Valley. This year alone, there have been at least 6 major incidents in the Jammu region, including the death of 9 people in Reasi in an attack on bus carrying pilgrims. 

Factors for increasing terrorism in recent times:

  • Approaching elections in J&K: Supreme Court has given a deadline to hold elections by September 30 in UT of J&K. As these elections are fast approaching terrorists and their backers have stepped up their activity damage the chances of return to political normalcy.
  • Healthy Participation in Lok Sabha elections: Voter turnout in the Kashmir region was around 58.6% which is the highest in past 35 years. This shows enhanced trust among the citizens in the electoral process. Terrorist groups and Pakistan particularly who want to show the apathy of the citizen of J&K towards the Indian state must not be happy with this development. Hence, have increased their activity.
  • Strategic repositioning of forces towards Eastern Ladakh: Due to the enhanced security challenges being posed by China along the Ladakh and Arunachal Borders, the large majority of armed forces has shifted from the Kashmir region to Ladakh and Arunachal. This has created a security vaccuium in the J&K region making it easier for terrorist groups to attack. 
  • Greater reliance on local terrorists: As the India's border security infrastructure has improved in recent times, the strategy of terrorist groups has been increasingly to radicalise and hire local youth as terrorists. This also helps to keep their propaganda that terrorism in J&K is home grown born out of of apathy of local citizens against the Indian state alive. 
  • New techniques and technologies employed by terrorists: Terrorists have started to use new techniques which are easily available such as drones, telegram groups etc. These allow terrorist groups to bypass the eyes of Indian intelligence agencies.
  • Rise of new terror groups: In recent years, there has been rise of new terror outfits in the region which are either offshoots of older terror groups such as JeM, Hizbul Mujahideen like The Resistance Front, 
  • Pakistan's policy of state support to terrorism in J&K: Even since the Independence, Pakistan has maintained that it has moral right over province of J&K as it is Muslim majority and by the principle of 'Two-State Solution' should have gone to Pakistan. Pakistan has tried to enforce many warns on the issue of J&K and each time has been successfully defeated by India. As the overt military adventures of Pakistan failed, Pakistan started supporting terror groups in the valley to push its agenda of antagonizing citizens against India.
  • Attitude of Pakistan's military: Pakistan Army is the most important power centre in the political landscape of Pakistan. The Pakistani Army has a vested interest in keeping the security pot boiling between India and Pakistan, which increases their legitimacy and high budgets. 
  • Lost generation of youth: Large population of youth in the region remains alienated from the Indian state due to lack of economic opportunities in the past two decades and widespread terrorism and violence in the region which has made them loose family members. Often they fall into the fishing net of terror recruiters and succumb to resorting terrorism.
  • Radical Islam: Kashmir's sufi version of Islam has been increasingly replaced by a wahabi cult of islam which thrives on the philosophy of jehad against the Indian state. The earlier movement for self-dependence has increasingly taken a communal colour rooted against the minority hindu and other religions of India.  
  • India's security centric response to Pakistani terrorism: Ever since the 2008 Mumbai Terror attack, India has followed the policy of 'talks and terror cannot go together'. However, this overt reliance on security to stop Pakistan's support of terrorism has not resulted into complete stoppage of terrorism from Pakistan. However, changing the behaviour of Pakistan should demand both a mix of diplomatic and security measures.

Way forward:

Security related measures: 

  • Boosting border security to reduce infiltration of terrorists, ammunitions and other support from Pakistan into Kashmir. 
  • Empowerment of J&K Police with state of the art technology and manpower who are the first respondents in terror related cases.
  • Improving intelligence capabilities of security forces like the Army in the region to have better control of terrorism.
  • Arrest routes of terror financing the region to plug the flow of funds which are used to finance terrorism.
  • Better training in counter insurgency operations and strict adherence to standard operating protocols to reduce casualities among the armed forces. 

Confidence building measures:

  • Normalisation of provincial democratic system in the region while increase the trust of the people in the region in India's constitution and liberal values.
  • Addressing the alienation of citizens by focusing on economic and human development. 
  • Special economic package and tax rebates for greenfield industries in the region.

Foreign policy related measures:

  • India should try to present credible evidence of support of Pakistan to terror groups on global forums like UN.