Economy

All (4050)Current Affairs (4038)Mains Practice (126)Mains PYQs by Subjects (40)

Government Buys Back G-Secs through RBI’s Switch Auction

Context: According to Business Standard, the Government of India recently bought back Government Securities (G-Secs) through a switch auction conducted by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The move aims to ease redemption pressures on upcoming debt maturities and improve the government’s overall debt management strategy.

image 13

What is a Switch Auction?

A Switch Auction is a debt management tool used by the RBI on behalf of the Government of India. Under this mechanism:

  • The government repurchases bonds that are close to maturity.
  • In exchange, it issues new long-term bonds to investors.

This process helps spread repayment obligations over a longer time horizon, thereby reducing short-term redemption pressure on government finances.

About Government Securities (G-Secs)

Government Securities (G-Secs) are tradable debt instruments issued by the Central or State Governments to finance public expenditure and fiscal deficits.

Key Features

  • Sovereign Guarantee
    G-Secs are often called “gilt-edged securities” because they carry very low default risk, backed by the government.
  • Liquidity Management Tool
    The RBI uses G-Secs in Open Market Operations (OMOs):
    • Buying G-Secs injects liquidity into the banking system.
    • Selling G-Secs absorbs excess liquidity.
  • Role in Banking Regulation
    Commercial banks must maintain a portion of their deposits in G-Secs to meet the Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) requirement.
  • Retail Participation
    Through the RBI Retail Direct Scheme (2021), individual investors can directly purchase G-Secs via Retail Direct Gilt (RDG) accounts.

Classification of Government Securities

1. Short-Term Securities

These instruments generally do not pay periodic interest and are issued at a discount to face value.

  • Treasury Bills (T-Bills)
    Issued by the Central Government with maturities of 91 days, 182 days, and 364 days.
  • Cash Management Bills (CMBs)
    Introduced in 2010 to manage temporary cash mismatches, with maturities less than 91 days.

2. Long-Term Securities

These securities have longer tenors and usually pay periodic coupon interest.

  • Dated Government Securities
    Issued by the Central Government with maturities ranging from 5 to 50 years, typically paying semi-annual interest.
  • State Development Loans (SDLs)
    Issued by State Governments to raise funds from the market for developmental expenditure.

Significance of the Switch Auction

  • Debt Management Efficiency: Helps manage large upcoming debt repayments.
  • Market Stability: Prevents sudden liquidity stress in bond markets.
  • Fiscal Flexibility: Spreads liabilities over longer maturities, improving fiscal planning.

Thus, switch auctions represent an important tool in India’s public debt management strategy, helping maintain stability in both government finances and financial markets.

Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Bill, 2026: Clarifying Repeal and Continuity

Context: As reported by Business Standard and CNBCTV18, the Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Bill, 2026 has been introduced in the Lok Sabha to remove interpretational ambiguities regarding “repeal and savings” provisions under the Industrial Relations Code, 2020. The move seeks to prevent avoidable litigation and ensure continuity in labour adjudication.

image 33

The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 consolidated three major labour laws:

  • Trade Unions Act, 1926
  • Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946
  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Key Amendments

1. Repeal Clarification

The amendment explicitly states that repeal of the three legacy laws operates by virtue of Section 104 of the Code itself, and not through any separate executive repeal mechanism. This removes ambiguity regarding the source of repeal authority.

2. Savings Continuity

It reinforces that past rights, liabilities, penalties, notifications, and ongoing proceedings under the old laws continue without disruption. This ensures smooth transition and protects pending disputes.

3. Legal Certainty Shield

The drafting has been tightened to guard against misconceived constitutional challenges such as ultra vires or excessive delegation arguments, which could otherwise undermine the Code’s implementation.

Why the Amendment Was Necessary

  • High Litigation Burden: With nearly 54 million pending cases in Indian courts, even narrow interpretational disputes can escalate into prolonged litigation.
  • Continuity Risks in Labour Disputes: Labour cases often span several years. Any uncertainty over “which law applies” can delay proceedings through preliminary objections.
  • Large Compliance Universe: With approximately 7.7 crore MSMEs registered nationally, minor drafting ambiguities can multiply into widespread compliance confusion.

Significance

  • Regulatory Predictability: Clear repeal mechanics stabilise the legal foundation for employers, trade unions, and labour authorities.
  • Faster Dispute Resolution: Reduced scope for preliminary jurisdictional challenges allows tribunals to focus on substantive issues.
  • Reform Credibility: Demonstrates legislative responsiveness to safeguard the labour code architecture, strengthening investor and labour confidence.

Potential Concerns

  • Drafting Optics: A clarificatory amendment soon after enactment may raise concerns regarding initial drafting precision.
  • Residual Transition Issues: Questions relating to subordinate legislation, rule-making, or forum transitions may still arise.
  • Compliance Fatigue: Frequent amendments may create uncertainty, especially among MSMEs managing layered regulatory obligations.

The Amendment Bill primarily aims to ensure legal continuity and interpretational clarity, reinforcing the structural integrity of India’s labour reform framework.

RBI Draft Guidelines for Loan Recovery Agents: Strengthening Borrower Protection

Context: As reported by The Hindu, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued comprehensive draft guidelines to regulate the conduct of bank employees and loan recovery agents. These directions aim to curb coercive recovery practices, safeguard borrower dignity, and strengthen ethical standards in credit recovery. The guidelines will apply to all Commercial Banks, including Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) and Small Finance Banks, and are proposed to come into force from 1 July 2026.

Key Highlights of the Draft Guidelines

  1. Civil and Ethical Conduct
    Banks and their agents must interact with borrowers strictly in a civil manner. Harassment, abusive language, intimidation, or threats are explicitly prohibited, reinforcing fair debt collection norms.
  2. Contact Restrictions
    Recovery-related calls or visits are permitted only between 8:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Agents are barred from contacting borrowers during sensitive personal occasions such as bereavement, weddings, or medical emergencies.
  3. Authorisation and Transparency
    Before assigning a recovery agent, banks must inform borrowers in writing. Agents must carry a valid authorisation letter and identity card during visits, ensuring transparency and accountability.
  4. Agent Certification and Training
    All recovery agents must undergo ethical debt collection training and obtain certification from the Indian Institute of Banking and Finance (IIBF), professionalising recovery practices.
  5. Privacy Protection
    The guidelines reinforce the borrower’s Right to Privacy. Agents may communicate only with the borrower or guarantor, and not with family members, neighbours, or workplace colleagues.
  6. Grievance Redressal First
    Banks can refer recovery cases to agents only after resolving pending borrower grievances, preventing premature or unfair recovery action.
  7. Incentive Structure Reform
    Banks must redesign incentive mechanisms to ensure they do not encourage aggressive or unethical recovery behaviour.

Significance

  • Borrower Dignity: Curtails harassment and coercion in loan recovery.
  • Consumer Protection: Aligns banking practices with constitutional privacy principles.
  • Institutional Accountability: Shifts responsibility squarely onto banks for agent conduct.
  • Ethical Credit Culture: Encourages trust-based lending and repayment systems.

RBI Expands Collateral-Free Credit: A Boost for India’s MSME Growth Engine

Context: To strengthen credit flow to small businesses, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has proposed raising the ceiling for collateral-free bank loans to MSMEs. Alongside this, RBI has also proposed permitting bank lending to Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) under strict prudential safeguards. The move is aimed at deepening formal credit access while maintaining financial stability.

image 21

What is the New Collateral-Free Loan Proposal?

The RBI has proposed doubling the collateral-free loan limit for MSMEs from ₹10 lakh to ₹20 lakh. This is a significant reform because many micro and small enterprises lack land, property, or fixed assets that banks usually demand as collateral.

The proposal encourages banks to shift towards cash-flow based lending, where credit decisions are made using:

  • business turnover,
  • repayment behaviour,
  • digital transaction history, and
  • viability of the enterprise.

This approach reduces overdependence on asset-backed lending and improves inclusion of first-generation entrepreneurs.

The reform also aligns with Priority Sector Lending (PSL) norms and complements credit guarantee frameworks, which reduce bank risk while improving MSME access to affordable loans.

Why This Matters for MSMEs

MSMEs are often described as the backbone of the Indian economy but face a major financing bottleneck.

  • India’s MSME sector faces an estimated credit gap of ₹20–25 lakh crore, largely due to collateral constraints.
  • Around 40–45% of micro enterprises depend on informal lenders, leading to high interest costs and financial vulnerability.
  • MSMEs employ around 11 crore people, meaning easier credit directly supports wage stability, expansion, and job creation.

Thus, expanding collateral-free lending can promote formalisation, productivity growth, and resilience of small firms.

Status of MSMEs in India

  • India has about 6.3 crore MSMEs, and nearly 99% are micro enterprises (Udyam data).
  • They contribute nearly 30% to GDP and around 45% to manufacturing output.
  • MSMEs account for about 43–45% of India’s merchandise exports, making them essential for global competitiveness.

Other Measure: Bank Lending to REITs

RBI has also proposed allowing banks to lend to REITs, enabling regulated credit flow into income-generating commercial real estate. This could strengthen infrastructure financing and support real estate formalisation.

However, to avoid systemic risk, RBI proposes prudential controls such as:

  • exposure limits,
  • risk weights,
  • due diligence norms, and
  • concentration safeguards.

Conclusion

By expanding collateral-free lending and promoting cash-flow based assessment, RBI’s proposal can significantly improve MSME credit access, reduce dependence on informal finance, and support employment growth.

If supported by strong monitoring and credit discipline, it can become a key driver of inclusive industrial expansion.

RBI’s Digital Fraud Relief Plan: New Safety Net for Small-Value Victims

Context: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has proposed a compensation framework for victims of small-value digital frauds, aiming to restore trust in digital payments and strengthen consumer protection. The proposal focuses on fraud cases up to ₹50,000, which account for nearly 65% of all digital fraud incidents.

image 15

Key Features of the Proposed Compensation Framework

The scheme provides compensation for eligible victims of digital fraud up to ₹25,000, or 85% of the loss, whichever is lower. This design ensures meaningful relief while preventing misuse.

A major reform is the inclusion of cases involving inadvertent credential sharing, provided the act was not mala fide. Earlier liability rules often excluded compensation when negligence was involved. This reflects a more citizen-friendly approach, recognising that fraudsters increasingly use deception-based tactics such as phishing and fake customer care calls.

To discourage habitual carelessness, the relief will be available only once per customer, creating a balance between protection and accountability.

Liability Sharing: “Skin in the Game” Model

The proposed framework distributes the financial burden among stakeholders:

  • Customer: Bears 15% of the loss as a deductible, encouraging continued vigilance.
  • Bank: Contributes a proposed ~15%, incentivising stronger cybersecurity and fraud detection systems.
  • RBI: Covers the remaining ~70% through a central fund, subject to the compensation cap.

This approach ensures shared responsibility rather than shifting the entire cost to one entity.

Funding through the Depositor Education and Awareness (DEA) Fund

Compensation payouts will be financed through the Depositor Education and Awareness (DEA) Fund, which currently holds a surplus of around ₹85,000 crore.

About the DEA Fund

  • Established by RBI in 2014 under Section 26A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
  • Banks transfer balances of unclaimed/inoperative accounts for 10+ years into the fund.
  • Depositors retain the right to reclaim their money with interest; transfer does not extinguish ownership.
  • RBI pays interest on the transferred amount, which banks must pass to depositors upon settlement.
  • The fund is primarily meant for depositor awareness programmes, but is now proposed to support fraud compensation.

RBI has also launched the UDGAM portal, enabling citizens to search unclaimed deposits across banks, improving transparency.

Significance of the Proposal

The framework can strengthen confidence in digital transactions, particularly for small users, senior citizens, and first-time digital adopters. It also aligns with India’s push for a secure digital economy under UPI-based payments and fintech expansion.

Conclusion

RBI’s proposed compensation mechanism is a major step towards consumer-centric digital governance. If implemented effectively, it can reduce financial distress from small frauds while promoting stronger banking security and responsible user behaviour.

Economic Survey 2025–26: Mapping India’s Growth with Disciplined Swadeshi

Context: The Economic Survey 2025–26 was tabled in Parliament by the Union Finance Minister ahead of the Union Budget 2026. The Survey introduces the core idea of “Disciplined Swadeshi”—a calibrated development strategy that rejects inward-looking protectionism while firmly integrating India into global supply chains with domestic strength and competitiveness.

image 13

About the Economic Survey

The Economic Survey of India is the Ministry of Finance’s annual flagship publication that reviews macroeconomic performance over the previous year and presents policy-oriented insights.

  • Prepared by: Economic Division, Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) under the Chief Economic Advisor
  • Presented since: 1950–51 (separately from the Budget since 1964)
  • Legal Status: Non-statutory and non-binding
  • Contents: Macroeconomic trends, sectoral performance, thematic chapters, and statistical annexures

Key Highlights of Economic Survey 2025–26

1. State of the Economy

India remains the fastest-growing major economy:

  • Real GDP growth (FY26): 7.4%
  • FY27 outlook: 6.8–7.2%
  • Medium-term potential growth revised upward to 7%

Growth is increasingly consumption-driven:

  • Private Final Consumption Expenditure (PFCE) rose to a 12-year high of 61.5% of GDP
  • Rural demand improved due to strong agriculture, while urban demand was supported by stable employment

Investment momentum continued:

  • Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) grew 7.6%, sustaining around 30% of GDP

2. Fiscal Developments

Fiscal consolidation progressed alongside growth:

  • Fiscal deficit: 4.8% (FY25); 4.4% target for FY26
  • Revenue receipts increased to 9.2% of GDP, reflecting higher tax buoyancy
  • Direct tax base expanded to 9.2 crore ITR filers
  • GST collections rose 6.7% YoY to ₹17.4 lakh crore (Apr–Dec 2025)

Quality of expenditure improved:

  • Effective Capital Expenditure increased to 4.0% of GDP
  • General Government debt-to-GDP declined by 7.1 percentage points since 2020

3. Monetary Management and Financial Inclusion

  • RBI policy stance: Neutral
  • Repo rate cut by 125 bps since Feb 2025 to 5.25%
  • Banking health improved: GNPA at a multi-decadal low of 2.2%

Financial inclusion deepened:

  • PM Jan Dhan Yojana: 55.02 crore accounts, majority in rural/semi-urban areas
  • Capital market participation crossed 12 crore investors, with women ~25%

4. Inflation and Prices

  • Retail inflation averaged a historic low of 1.7% (Apr–Dec 2025), driven by food deflation
  • Core inflation remained elevated at 4.62%, largely due to global precious metal prices
  • Lower food and fuel inflation boosted household purchasing power

5. Agriculture and Allied Sectors

  • Agriculture growth (FY26): 3.1%
  • Horticulture output (362.08 MT) exceeded foodgrains (357.7 MT) for the second year
  • Fish production surged 142% in a decade, reaching 188.7 lakh tonnes

6. Industry and Infrastructure

  • Industrial GVA growth projected at 6.2%, led by manufacturing
  • Rail electrification reached 99.1% of broad-gauge routes
  • India became the 3rd largest domestic aviation market, with 164 operational airports
  • DISCOMs recorded a positive PAT of ₹2,701 crore for the first time
  • High-speed highway corridors expanded to 5,364 km

7. Services Sector

  • Share in GDP: 53.6% (H1 FY26)
  • Growth (FY26): 9.1%
  • Attracted over 80% of FDI inflows (FY23–FY25)
  • Services exports reached $387.5 billion, ranking 7th globally

8. External Sector

  • Forex reserves: $701.4 billion, covering 11 months of imports
  • India’s share in global exports: 1.8% (merchandise) and 4.3% (services)
  • Remittances: $135.4 billion (3.5% of GDP)
  • External debt: $746 billion; sovereign external debt < 5% of total government debt

9. Social Infrastructure and Employment

  • Unemployment rate declined to 4.9% (Q3 FY26)
  • Female LFPR rose to 41.7%
  • Multidimensional Poverty reduced to 11.28%
  • Social sector spending increased to 7.9% of GDP
  • e-Shram portal registered 31+ crore unorganised workers

Conclusion

The Economic Survey 2025–26 presents a confident picture of India’s economy—growth with stability, inclusion, and resilience—anchored in the philosophy of Disciplined Swadeshi, balancing domestic capability with global integration.

From Imports to Independence: India’s Pulse Self-Reliance Drive

Context: The Union Agriculture Minister launched the National Self-Reliance in Pulses Mission from the Food Legumes Research Platform (FLRP), Madhya Pradesh—signalling a structural shift from import dependence to a resilient, farmer-centric pulse economy.

image 17

Why Pulses Matter

Pulses are central to India’s nutrition security, soil health, and climate resilience. As rain-fed, nitrogen-fixing crops, they reduce fertiliser dependence, improve soil fertility, and provide affordable protein to millions. Yet, despite being the world’s largest producer and consumer of pulses, India remains a major importer—exposing domestic markets to global price volatility and forex risks.

Core Design of the Mission

The Mission adopts a seed-to-market value-chain approach, integrating research, farm practices, procurement, processing, and organised marketing.

  • Cluster Model: Contiguous cultivation clusters enable collective input supply, uniform agronomy, and direct linkage with processors—lowering costs and market frictions.
  • Decentralised Seed System: States and farmer networks can release and distribute location-specific varieties, accelerating adoption of high-yielding, climate-resilient seeds.
  • Research–Farmer Bridge: The FLRP connects ICAR–ICARDA research with farmers for rapid field validation of disease-resistant and early-maturing varieties.
  • Value Addition: Emphasis shifts from raw pulses to branded, protein-rich products, boosting farm incomes and rural employment.

Structural Challenges

  • Shrinking Area: Pulses acreage declined from 29.3 million ha (2016–17) to ~27.4 million ha (2023–24).
  • Low Productivity: Yields hover around 850–900 kg/ha, well below the global average of 1,200–1,300 kg/ha due to rain-fed dependence and input gaps.
  • Import Dependence: India imported ~2.8–3 million tonnes annually (2022–24); FY25 imports may touch 6.5–6.8 million tonnes, with yellow peas forming ~30%.
  • Price Volatility: In bumper years, market prices often fall 20–30% below MSP, discouraging cultivation.
  • Processing Deficit: Less than 10% of output is processed near farm gates, eroding farmers’ price share.

Roadmap to Self-Reliance

  • 1,000 Pulse Mills: Up to ₹25 lakh subsidy per unit for decentralised milling, cutting transport costs and creating jobs.
  • Farmer Incentives: Quality seed kits plus ₹10,000/ha assistance for model farming in clusters.
  • Targeted R&D: Yield gains in chana, tur, urad, moong, and lentil through pest-resistant, short-duration varieties.
  • Cooperative Federalism: States to prepare agro-climatic roadmaps aligned with national goals.

Strategic Significance

Achieving pulse self-reliance will strengthen food and nutritional security, stabilise prices, reduce import bills, and make Indian agriculture more climate-smart.

If implemented with predictable MSP procurement, assured markets, and robust extension services, the Mission can convert India’s protein deficit into a protein dividend.

India’s Rising Fiscal Capacity: What a 19.6% Tax–GDP Ratio Signals

Context: A recent assessment estimates India’s overall tax-to-GDP ratio at 19.6% in FY2024, covering both Centre and States. This marks steady improvement in domestic resource mobilisation, reflecting expanding formalisation, improved compliance, and stronger direct tax collections.

image 1

Key Trends

  • Central Gross Tax Revenue: ~11.2% of GDP in FY24; projected 11.7% in FY25.
  • Direct Taxes: Ratio reached a 15-year high of 6.64% in FY24; likely to rise to 6.7% in FY25.
  • Tax Buoyancy: Long-term buoyancy at 1.1, meaning tax revenues grow slightly faster than nominal GDP.
  • Global Position: India’s ratio is above many emerging economies (e.g., Malaysia, Indonesia) but below the OECD average (~34%).

Understanding the Tax-to-GDP Ratio

  • Definition: Share of total tax revenue in a country’s nominal GDP.
  • Formula: Total Annual Tax Revenue ÷ Nominal GDP.
  • Fiscal Capacity Indicator: Shows the state’s ability to mobilise domestic resources.
  • Economic Signal: Higher ratios imply a broader tax base and formal economy.
  • Global Benchmark: The World Bank suggests 15% as a tipping point for sustainable development.

Positive Implications

  • Fiscal Stability: Reduces dependence on borrowing; supports fiscal consolidation.
  • Public Investment: Enables higher capital expenditure on infrastructure and welfare.
  • Redistributive Role: Rising direct taxes strengthen progressive redistribution.

Potential Risks

  • Consumption Drag: Excessive taxation may reduce disposable incomes.
  • Inflationary Effects: High indirect taxes (GST, excise) can raise prices.
  • Investment Concerns: Over-taxation could deter investment or trigger capital relocation.

Tax Buoyancy Explained

  • Meaning: Responsiveness of tax revenue growth to changes in nominal GDP.
  • Formula: % Change in Tax Revenue ÷ % Change in Nominal GDP.
  • Buoyancy > 1: Revenue grows faster than the economy due to better compliance or base expansion.
  • Buoyancy < 1: Collections lag, indicating evasion, exemptions, or informality.
  • Sustained buoyancy above 1 gradually raises the tax-to-GDP ratio.

From Waste to Wealth: India’s Shift Towards a Circular Economy

Context: India’s rapid urbanisation and consumption-led growth have stretched its linear “take–make–dispose” waste management model to the brink. Transitioning to a circular waste management model, where waste is minimised, reused, recycled, and converted into resources, is now essential for environmental sustainability, resource security, and green growth.

image 13

India’s Waste Management Landscape

India generates nearly 1.70 lakh tonnes of municipal solid waste daily, projected to touch 165 million tonnes annually by 2030.

However, only 55–70% of collected waste is scientifically processed, leaving over 16 crore tonnes of legacy waste across 2,450 active dumpsites.

The challenge is magnified by sectoral waste streams. India ranks third globally in e-waste generation, with volumes rising 15–20% annually. Around 150 million tonnes of construction and demolition (C&D) waste are generated each year, often dumped illegally. Plastic waste, estimated at 9 million tonnes annually, is dominated by single-use plastics, creating persistent ecological risks.

Legal and Policy Framework

The Constitution empowers urban local bodies under Article 243W to manage sanitation and solid waste, while Article 51A(g) places a fundamental duty on citizens to protect the environment.

The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 acts as the umbrella law for waste governance. Key rules include:

  • Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016: mandate source segregation into wet, dry, and hazardous waste.
  • Construction and Demolition Waste Management Rules, 2025: introduce Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and recycling targets.
  • Plastic Waste Management Amendment Rules, 2025: mandate QR-based digital tracking and minimum recycled-plastic content.

Why a Circular Model Matters

A circular economy can unlock ₹3.5 trillion annually by 2030 and generate 10 million green jobs by 2050.

Material recovery from e-waste, batteries, and end-of-life vehicles reduces dependence on imported raw materials and critical minerals.

Processing 50% of wet waste through bio-methanation can generate ₹2,460 crore annually while cutting over 10 million tonnes of CO₂-equivalent emissions. Scientific remediation of dumpsites can free 10,000+ hectares of urban land, while Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) can replace 10–30% of fossil fuels in industries. Recycling C&D waste conserves virgin minerals and lowers infrastructure costs.

Key Challenges

Despite its promise, the circular transition faces hurdles. NITI Aayog estimates an investment need of USD 50–80 billion over the next decade, beyond the capacity of most municipalities. Policy fragmentation across ministries weakens enforcement, while low user charges and volatile recycled-material prices undermine financial viability.

Further, nearly 90% of waste handling is done by informal workers without legal protection, and rising consumerism erodes traditional repair-and-reuse practices.

Government Initiatives

  • Swachh Bharat Mission (Urban) 2.0: remediation of 2,400+ dumpsites by October 2026.
  • Cities Coalition for Circularity (C-3): city-level collaboration platform.
  • GOBAR-dhan Scheme: converts biodegradable waste into CBG and manure.
  • Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): shifts recycling costs to producers.
  • Mission LiFE: promotes sustainable lifestyles.
  • Waste to Wealth Mission: deploys technologies for resource recovery.

Conclusion

A circular waste economy is not merely an environmental imperative but a strategic pathway for India’s urban resilience, climate action, and economic transformation.

Banks Enter India’s Pension Asset Space

Context: In a significant reform in India’s pension ecosystem, the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) has approved a framework permitting banks to sponsor pension fund entities for managing assets under the National Pension System (NPS). This marks a shift from the earlier, limited role of banks as service facilitators to active participants in pension asset management.

image 12

What Has Changed?

Until now, Scheduled Commercial Banks functioned mainly as Points of Presence—responsible for onboarding NPS subscribers, collecting contributions, and providing customer services. Under the new framework, eligible banks can now establish and sponsor a Pension Fund Manager (PFM), enabling them to directly manage retirement savings invested through NPS.

Eligibility for this expanded role will be aligned with RBI prudential norms, including minimum net worth, market capitalisation, governance standards, and overall financial soundness.

This ensures that only stable and well-capitalised banks enter the pension fund management space.

About the National Pension System (NPS)

The National Pension System is a voluntary, defined-contribution retirement scheme regulated by PFRDA. It is open to all Indian citizens and Overseas Citizens of India aged 18–70.

Key features include:

  • Subscriber Choice: Individuals can select their Pension Fund Manager and asset allocation mix.
  • Portability: A Permanent Retirement Account Number (PRAN) remains valid across jobs and locations.
  • Investment Structure: Contributions are professionally invested across equities, government securities, corporate bonds, and select alternative assets, generating market-linked returns.

Withdrawal and Annuity Provisions

At the normal retirement age of 60:

  • Government subscribers may withdraw up to 60% of the accumulated corpus tax-free.
  • At least 40% must be invested in an annuity purchased from PFRDA-empanelled providers, providing a taxable monthly pension.
  • For non-government subscribers, recent reforms permit lump-sum withdrawal of up to 80%, offering greater flexibility.

Role of PFRDA

The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority functions as the statutory pension regulator under the Ministry of Finance.

Established as an interim body in 2003 and granted statutory status through the PFRDA Act, 2013, it aims to promote old-age income security.

PFRDA regulates pension funds, sets investment and governance norms, benchmarks performance, and administers key schemes such as NPS, Atal Pension Yojana (APY), Unified Pension Scheme (UPS), and NPS Vatsalya.

Why This Matters

Allowing banks to manage pension assets can deepen competition, improve fund management expertise, and enhance long-term returns for subscribers.

At the same time, RBI-aligned eligibility norms help safeguard retirement savings by ensuring prudential oversight and financial stability.

Breaking Ground: Why Land Acquisition Slows India’s Infrastructure Push

Context: Land acquisition has emerged as the single largest bottleneck in India’s infrastructure projects reviewed under PRAGATI (Pro-Active Governance and Timely Implementation). Government data show that land acquisition alone accounts for 35% of project delays, while environmental clearances and right-of-way (RoW) issues together contribute to 73% of delays nationwide. This underscores a persistent governance challenge at a time when India is scaling up capital expenditure to fuel economic growth.

image 11

What is Land Acquisition?

Land acquisition refers to the government’s power to acquire private land for public purposes such as roads, railways, defence, industrial corridors, urban infrastructure, and social projects.

In India, this process is governed by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (LARR) Act, 2013.

Key safeguards under the Act include:

  • Social Impact Assessment (SIA): Mandatory assessment of impacts on livelihoods, infrastructure, and local communities before acquisition.
  • Consent Norms: Prior consent of 80% of affected families for private projects and 70% for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects.
  • Compensation Framework:
    • 4× market value in rural areas
    • 2× market value in urban areas
  • Solatium: An additional 100% of compensation to account for the involuntary nature of acquisition.

While these provisions strengthen fairness and transparency, they also lengthen timelines and increase project costs.

Why Does Land Acquisition Cause Delays?

Several structural and administrative factors contribute to delays:

  • Lengthy Procedures: SIA studies, public hearings, and consent processes are time-consuming.
  • Litigation Risks: Disputes over valuation, consent, and rehabilitation often lead to prolonged court cases.
  • Federal Complexity: Land is a State subject, leading to uneven implementation across states.
  • Social Resistance: Inadequate trust, fear of livelihood loss, and displacement concerns fuel opposition.

India’s Expanding Infrastructure Landscape

Despite these hurdles, India’s infrastructure push is unprecedented:

  • Capital Investment: The Union Budget 2025–26 allocated ₹11.21 lakh crore (3.1% of GDP) for capital expenditure.
  • Roads: Second-largest road network globally; 1,46,145 km of National Highways (2024).
  • Railways: 99.2% electrification of the Broad Gauge network by 2025.
  • Aviation: Third-largest domestic aviation market after the US and China.
  • Ports & Shipping: Under Sagarmala 2.0, cargo handling reached 1,630 MT, improving India’s global shipment ranking from 44th to 22nd.
  • Urban Transport: Third-largest metro network globally, spanning 1,013 km across 23 cities.
  • Rural Water: Jal Jeevan Mission achieved 80% rural tap water coverage by early 2025.

Way Forward

To reconcile rapid infrastructure growth with social justice:

  • Digitise Land Records: Reduce disputes through clear titling.
  • Time-bound SIAs: Standardise and streamline assessment timelines.
  • Negotiated Settlements: Promote land pooling and consent-based models.
  • Stronger Rehabilitation: Ensure livelihood security to build trust.

Farmer Suicides in India: Patterns, Causes and Policy Gap

Context: A 28-year analysis of NCRB data (1995–2023) reveals that farmer suicides in India remain a persistent, regionally concentrated crisis, with a sharp resurgence in 2023 after nearly a decade of decline. The pattern underscores deep structural vulnerabilities in Indian agriculture that welfare measures have only partially mitigated.

image 8

Scale and Long-Term Trends

Between 1995 and 2023, about 3.94 lakh farmers and agricultural labourers died by suicide—an average of ~13,600 deaths annually. The crisis peaked during 2000–2009, accounting for nearly 1.54 lakh deaths, with 2002 recording the highest single-year toll (17,971).

After 2010, suicides declined steadily, coinciding with expanded rural wage employment. However, 2023 marked a reversal, with 10,786 suicides, a ~75% jump over 2022. Notably, the profile has shifted: agricultural labourers (6,096) now outnumber cultivators (4,690), signalling distress beyond landholding farmers.

Regional Concentration

The crisis is geographically skewed. Maharashtra (4,151) and Karnataka (2,423) together accounted for the largest share in 2023. Over the long term, southern and western India contribute ~72.5% of total farmer suicides.

Andhra Pradesh and Telangana together have recorded ~1.7 lakh deaths over 28 years, reflecting chronic vulnerability in rainfed, cash-crop-dependent regions.

Role of Welfare Interventions

Post-2010 declines align with welfare expansion, especially MGNREGA, which provided alternative income during agrarian stress. Some states demonstrated sharp turnarounds: Kerala reduced suicides from 1,118 (2005) to 105 (2014), and West Bengal reported zero cases by 2012—highlighting the importance of income smoothing and social protection.

Structural Drivers of Distress

  • Rainfed Vulnerability: ~52% of India’s net sown area is rainfed, disproportionately linked to suicides.
  • Debt Trap: ~50% of agricultural households are indebted; average debt exceeds ₹74,000.
  • Trade Exposure: Post-1990s liberalisation reduced income support amid rising import competition.
  • Input Cost Inflation: Fertiliser, seed, and pesticide costs rose >300% since the early 2000s, while real farm incomes stagnated.

Way Forward

  • Income Assurance: Expand MSP procurement beyond rice–wheat; pilot price-deficiency payments.
  • Risk Protection: Reform PM Fasal Bima Yojana with automatic, weather-triggered payouts.
  • Rainfed Resilience: Scale integrated farming systems (millets–pulses–livestock) under NICRA in cotton belts.
  • Labour Security: Stabilise wages for agricultural labourers; replicate Kerala’s Ayyankali Employment Guarantee during lean seasons.

Trending now

Cyborg Botany: The Emerging Fusion of Plants and Electronics