Context: In recent decades, India has witnessed a sharp rise in the use of contract labour within the formal manufacturing sector.
Relevance of the Topic: Prelims: Concept of Contractualisation. Mains: Informalisation with formal sector - Reasons, Impact, Way Forward.
According to the Annual Survey of Industries (ASI), the share of contract workers in the manufacturing workforce has doubled from 20% in 1999-2000 to 40.7% in 2022-23.
This trend reflects the informalisation of the formal sector, raising concerns over worker exploitation, wage inequality, and declining productivity.
What is Contractualisation?
- It refers to the employment of workers on temporary, often third-party contracts, rather than permanent, directly employed roles.
Why Firms Prefer Contract Labour?
- Operational Flexibility: Allows firms to hire or fire workers based on market demand.
- Cost Savings: Wages and benefits are significantly lower than for permanent workers.
- Regulatory Evasion: Firms bypass rigid labour laws and industrial regulations.
- Short-Term Efficiency: Contract workers may fill temporary skill gaps or meet seasonal demand.
However, these apparent benefits mask deeper structural challenges and long-term inefficiencies.
Challenges associated with Contractualisation:
- Legal Exclusion & Vulnerability: Contract workers are generally excluded from key protections under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, such as safeguards against arbitrary dismissals and retrenchment. Hired through third-party contractors, they lack bargaining power and often face exploitative work conditions.
- Wage Disparities: In 2018-19, on an average, the contract workers earned 14.47% less than regular employees. In some sectors, employers' labour cost on contract workers was up to 85% lower than on regular workers.
- Impact on Labour Productivity: Though intended to provide flexibility, over-reliance on contract labour can undermine productivity, especially in labour-intensive and small-to-medium enterprises. ASI Plant-Level Data (1999-2019) shows that Contract Labour-Intensive (CLI) enterprises had 31% lower productivity than Regular Labour-Intensive (RLI) enterprises.
Why Productivity Declines?
- Principal-Agent Problem: Contractors may not align with the firm's long-term interests.
- Moral Hazard: Low job security may lead to worker disengagement.
- Poor skill development: Frequent exit and replacement of workers in a company or industry over a short period of time prevents skill development and innovation.
- No On-the-Job Training: Firms avoid investing in temporary workers.
Exceptions:
- Labour productivity was 5% higher in high-skill Contract Labour-Intensive (CLI) enterprises when compared to their low-skill counterparts, with the productivity advantage increasing significantly to 20% in large high-skill CLI enterprises.
- Similarly, large-size capital-intensive CLI enterprises recorded a 17% gain in labour productivity.
However, such types of enterprises account for only about 20% of the total formal manufacturing. The remaining 80% of the enterprises were adversely affected by contractualisation.
Policy Landscape and Reforms:
Labour Code on Industrial Relations 2020:
- The code allows firms to hire non-regular workers on fixed-term contracts directly without third party contractors. Aims to provide greater flexibility in hiring and firing.
- It also seeks to curb the exploitation of non-permanent workers by mandating the provision of basic statutory employment benefits.
- Yet to be fully implemented; trade unions fear it may further increase informalisation.
Pradhan Mantri Rojgar Protsahan Yojana (2016-2022):
- Aim: To incentivise job creation in the formal sector by bearing employer’s contribution (12%) to Employees’ Pension Scheme (EPS) and Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF).
- Though over one crore employees benefitted from the scheme, it was discontinued in 2022.
Way Forward
- Policymakers can incentivise firms to adopt reasonably longer fixed-term contracts by offering concessions in social security contributions or subsidised access to government skilling programmes. This could enhance workforce stability and support skill accumulation, while also assuaging labour union fears about the potential rise in the precarious employment.
- Reviving and extending support under the PMRPY could help curb the misuse of contract labour and promote formalisation in the manufacturing sector.





