Health

No cause for alarm

Context: More than three years after the COVID-19 pandemic began, newer variants have emerged with an uptick in cases, hospitalisations, and even deaths. 

Major Highlights:

  • After Kappa, Delta, BA.2.75, and BA.2.76, the latest variant (first detected in India) is the Omicron recombinant XBB.1.16. This variant accounts for over 30% of all sequenced genomes in March 2023, and its proportion has been increasing.
  • However, there is no need for alarm as there has been no concomitant increase in hospitalisations, even among vulnerable groups, which suggests that clinical severity in infected people might not be a concern.
    • India is fully relying on hybrid immunity arising from vaccination and natural infection for extended protection.
    • Fortunately, the estimated 95% of India’s population above 12 years possessing hybrid immunity has been shielding people from serious COVID-19 disease even when a few Omicron variants caused a spike in 2022.

Way Forward:

  • People, especially from vulnerable groups, carry a higher risk of infection from COVID, so they need to follow basic precautions such as wearing a mask in closed space settings when newer variants emerge.
  • There is a need to increase whole genome sequencing to help track the new variants that might emerge and gear the country for any major outbreak. 
Hybrid immunity will save India GFX

Hybrid immunity:

  • Hybrid immunity refers to the protection against a disease that results from a combination of natural immunity gained through infection and vaccination-induced immunity. E.g., A person who had previously contracted COVID-19 and then received a COVID-19 vaccine would have hybrid immunity to the virus. 
  • Research suggests that hybrid immunity may provide better protection against certain diseases than either natural or vaccine-induced immunity alone. However, the extent of protection and the duration of hybrid immunity is an area of active research and varies depending on the specific disease and the individual's immune response.

WHO Global report on sodium intake

Context: WHO has released a report on Sodium intake. 

Functions of Sodium

  • Essential nutrient involved in the maintenance of normal cellular homeostasis and in the regulation of fluid and electrolyte balance.
  • Crucial for maintaining extra-cellular fluid volume because of its osmotic action.
  • Essential for muscle and nerve cell function.
  • Essential for transport of nutrients through plasma membrane.
  • In many high-income countries, and increasingly in low- and middle-income countries, a significant proportion of sodium intake can be attributed to processed food

Guidelines for Sodium Intake

Sodium intake is extremely unlikely in healthy individuals. The minimum intake level required for physiological needs is not well established although it is estimated to be <500 mg/day. Hence, most populations are consuming much more sodium than sodium than is physiologically necessary.

However, there adverse effects with a diet high in sodium:

  • Raised blood pressure.
  • Gastric cancer
  • Obesity
  • Meniere's disease
  • Osteoporosis

WHO Guidelines on Sodium Intake recommends

  • A reduction in sodium intake to reduce blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke and coronary heart disease in adults. WHO recommends a maximum intake of <2000 mg/day sodium (<5g/day salt) in adults.
  • A reduction in sodium intake to control blood pressure in children. Recommended maximum intake of <2000 mg/day sodium and (<5 g/day salt) in adults should be adjusted downward based on the energy requirements of children relative to those of adults.
  • Lowering sodium content in food products
  • Implementing front of pack labelling to help consumers select food products with lower sodium content.
  • Conducting mass-media campaigns to alter consumer behaviour around sodium.
  • Implementing public food procurement and service policies to reduce sodium content in food served or sold. 
  • All 194 Member States of WHO have committed to reducing population sodium intake by 30% by 2025 in 2013. However, as no country in the world is on track to attain this target. WHO has proposed 30% reduction target for 2030.
  • WHO has documented progress to date on policies through Sodium Country Score Card. It assesses country implementation of sodium reduction policies and other measures, allocating a score from 1 (for lowest level of implementation) to 4 (for highest level of implementation).

Suggestions for reducing Sodium Intake

  • Maximum sodium content limits in foods: Setting of global sodium benchmarks is critical to facilitate reformulation of food products, which contributes to driving progress in sodium reduction.
  • Healthy public food procurement & service policies: Government should lead by example through the implementation of mandatory policies of sodium reduction that cover food and beverages purchased, subsidised, prepared, served in public agencies.
  • Nutrition Labelling: This tool empowers informs consumers about ingredients; nutrition content of food and influences consumers to make healthier choices and induce food manufactures to develop healthier food products. Mandatory labelling policies should also include nutrient declarations, including sodium, on the package and clear and simple interpretive front of pack labelling schemes.
  • Marketing restrictions: Implementing mandatory marketing restrictions is needed to limit exposure to unhealthy foods and beverages, to decrease demand for these products and to provide industry incentive to reformulate and market healthier products.
  • Fiscal policies: Fiscal policies to reduce population sodium intake include taxes on unhealthy foods and beverages or removing tax benefits for development and marketing of foods high in sodium. They can be strengthened by earmarking revenue for subsidies for fresh fruits and vegetables, or for implementation of other sodium reduction strategies.
  • Prioritisation: Action is required to increase the demand for change, drive societal shift, catalyse response and influence policy and decision makers to prioritise mandatory legislation.
  • Data: Regular reporting of data on sodium content in foods, and global access to such data, are needed to develop, monitor and evaluate sodium reduction policies and other measures. 

Right to Health

Context: 

  • The recently concluded Budget session of the Rajasthan Assembly revived the debate around the Right to Health Bill. The legislation, if passed, will provide mandatory free and affordable medical services in hospitals, clinics and laboratories — both public and privately owned. Rajasthan would be the first State government to establish and protect the legal rights of patients to access equitable healthcare services. The Bill also provides for strengthening the public healthcare system.
  • Fault lines have emerged around the legislation’s passage. Private hospital doctors object to the Bill citing it is hastily drafted, ignores ground realities and may tighten norms in an already over-regulated field. Civil society groups and activists, however, note that while the Bill needs clarity and could be sharpened to avoid implementation loopholes, it is an important starting point in framing healthcare as a tangible “right” for citizens.  

If we look at the syllabus of GS Paper II: 

L 2NNNAWHm2mShuf6k0vgH kDve3y2fWydWno83N6s3CB0FDJN igW MtDzAOizySmqz8 2FWC1an8xg OeQIMaicpxJG
uWMqVa0YhCv92Tx7pii17vJJ7Hf9yfjVdrvakNMn0PeWmgPV4pkC P6vwr1PY58r9l2Vrqo hc2LhCH22kvBBLLcZ8tjH6sb0 zDWr7d AEJ qyDJj6MxjpTIrEb0yMrgJZJAR mWNE7

Questions in Mains:  

  • 2020. In order to enhance the prospects of social development, sound and adequate health care policies are needed particularly in the fields of geriatric and maternal health care. Discuss.

In Questions like these Rajasthan Bill can be used as a case study. 

So we will: 

  • Importance of Health in Indian Context
  • There are several important health statistics in India, some of which include:
  • Does the Constitution guarantee a right to health? 
  • What does the Bill say? 

Importance of Health in Indian Context: 

  • Health is essential for economic development as a healthy population is more productive and can contribute to the growth of the economy. Poor health can result in increased absenteeism, reduced productivity, and higher healthcare costs, which can negatively impact the economy.
  • Poor health can contribute to poverty, and poverty can, in turn, lead to poor health outcomes. Access to healthcare services, clean water, and sanitation can help reduce poverty and improve health outcomes.
  • Health is essential for social development as it is linked to education, gender equity, and social justice. Improved health can lead to better educational outcomes, increased gender equity, and reduced social inequalities.
  • Health is essential for national security as it can affect the readiness of the armed forces and the ability of the country to respond to public health emergencies.
  • Health is a key component of sustainable development as it is linked to environmental sustainability, economic development, and social equity.

The current state of health in India is complex and multifaceted. On the one hand, there have been significant improvements in health indicators over the past few decades, such as increased life expectancy, reductions in maternal and child mortality, and improved access to healthcare services. 

However, there are still several challenges that need to be addressed, including high rates of malnutrition, a high burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases, inadequate healthcare infrastructure in rural areas, and a shortage of healthcare workers.

The COVID-19 pandemic has also highlighted the need for increased investments in public health infrastructure, strengthening of healthcare systems, and preparedness for future health emergencies. While progress has been made in addressing some of these challenges, more needs to be done to ensure better health outcomes for all citizens in India.

There are several important health statistics in India, some of which include:

Life expectancy: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the average life expectancy in India is around 69 years.

Infant mortality rate (IMR): As per the National Family Health Survey-4 (2015-16), the infant mortality rate in India is 32 per 1000 live births.

Maternal mortality rate (MMR): The maternal mortality rate in India, as per the latest estimates from the WHO, is 174 deaths per 100,000 live births.

Malnutrition: India has one of the highest rates of malnutrition in the world, with 38.4% of children under the age of five being stunted, 21% being wasted, and 35.8% being underweight, as per the Global Nutrition Report 2020.
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs): NCDs are responsible for 61% of deaths in India, with cardiovascular diseases, cancers, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes being the leading causes, according to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

Health expenditure: According to the National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2017-18, the total health expenditure in India was 3.6% of GDP, with the government contributing 32.3% of the total expenditure.

Doctor-patient ratio: India has a doctor-patient ratio of 1:1456, as per the National Health Profile 2021.

Health insurance coverage: As per the National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2017-18, only 27% of the total health expenditure was covered by health insurance, with out-of-pocket expenditure accounting for the rest.

Does the Constitution guarantee a right to health? 

  • The Indian Constitution does not explicitly talk about a right to health. 
  • A “right to health”, in theory, is derived from the right to life and liberty as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.  
  • Previously, courts have highlighted the State’s obligation to protect and promote the health of citizens, pointing to Constitutional provisions such as Article 38 (promoting the welfare of people) and Article 47 (which directs the government to meet the nutrition and health requirements of the population). 
  • In Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal (1996), the Supreme Court averred that it is the government’s responsibility to provide medical aid in the interest of bolstering public health.

In this regard, The current legislation tabled in Rajasthan is a welcome step. 

What does the Bill say? 

  • The Bill provides rights to patients and healthcare providers, places the obligation on the government to protect these legal rights and mandates the setting up of grievance redressal mechanisms.
  • The legislation will be a “progressive reduction in out-of-pocket expenditure in seeking, accessing or receiving health care” for patients, the preamble states. 
  • Rajasthan residents will be entitled to free check-ups, drugs, diagnostics, emergency transport and care at all public health institutes, along with affordable surgeries. The Bill frames medical services as a public service rather than a vehicle for making money. If enacted, the Act will have a recurring annual expenditure of Rs. 14.5 crores. 
  • Clause 3 of the Bill lays down 20 rights a State resident will be entitled to — including the right to informed consent, to seek information (in the form of medical records and documents) regarding diagnosis and treatment, to keep this data confidential and private and to receive treatment without discrimination based on caste, class, age, gender, among other markers.  
  • Clause 4 of the Bill shifts the burden of responsibility in providing adequate medical services to the government.
    • The government is “obligated” to provide funds, set up institutions and constitute grievance redressal systems. 
    • They must take the initiative to set up a State Health Authority and district health authorities. Beyond resolving complaints, the authorities would be tasked with planning healthcare services, monitoring services and conducting routine clinical, social and economic audits. 
  • Moreover, the Bill also talks about the safety of healthcare providers and improving public health infrastructure. 
  • Clause 4 mandates that the government develop a Human Resource Policy for Health ensuring the availability and equitable distribution of doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers at all levels of the system across regions. 

Hence, recognizing and protecting the right to health is certainly a good step in India, as it has the potential to improve the health outcomes of millions of people in the country.

India faces several health challenges, including high rates of infectious and non-communicable diseases, inadequate healthcare infrastructure, and unequal access to healthcare services.

Recognizing the right to health can help address these issues by promoting equitable access to healthcare services, ensuring that healthcare facilities and services are of high quality and available to all, and addressing the social determinants of health such as poverty, education, and access to clean water and sanitation.

Moreover, recognizing the right to health can help strengthen India's healthcare system by making it more responsive to the needs of its citizens.

It can also help hold the government accountable for ensuring that the health needs of its citizens are met, and provide a framework for addressing health disparities and promoting health equity.

Overall, recognizing the right to health is a positive step in India, and can help improve the health outcomes of its citizens and strengthen its healthcare system.

Multiple Indicator Survey (MIS) - NSS 78th Round Report [2020-21]

The National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) carried out the Multiple Indicator Survey (MIS) covering the entire country in its 78th round. The objectives of the MIS were:

  • To collect information for developing estimates of some important Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicators.
  • To collect information Purchase/Construction of house(s)/ flat(s) by the household for residential purpose after 31.03.2014 and information on Migration.
image 15