Agriculture

From Imports to Independence: India’s Pulse Self-Reliance Drive

Context: The Union Agriculture Minister launched the National Self-Reliance in Pulses Mission from the Food Legumes Research Platform (FLRP), Madhya Pradesh—signalling a structural shift from import dependence to a resilient, farmer-centric pulse economy.

image 17

Why Pulses Matter

Pulses are central to India’s nutrition security, soil health, and climate resilience. As rain-fed, nitrogen-fixing crops, they reduce fertiliser dependence, improve soil fertility, and provide affordable protein to millions. Yet, despite being the world’s largest producer and consumer of pulses, India remains a major importer—exposing domestic markets to global price volatility and forex risks.

Core Design of the Mission

The Mission adopts a seed-to-market value-chain approach, integrating research, farm practices, procurement, processing, and organised marketing.

  • Cluster Model: Contiguous cultivation clusters enable collective input supply, uniform agronomy, and direct linkage with processors—lowering costs and market frictions.
  • Decentralised Seed System: States and farmer networks can release and distribute location-specific varieties, accelerating adoption of high-yielding, climate-resilient seeds.
  • Research–Farmer Bridge: The FLRP connects ICAR–ICARDA research with farmers for rapid field validation of disease-resistant and early-maturing varieties.
  • Value Addition: Emphasis shifts from raw pulses to branded, protein-rich products, boosting farm incomes and rural employment.

Structural Challenges

  • Shrinking Area: Pulses acreage declined from 29.3 million ha (2016–17) to ~27.4 million ha (2023–24).
  • Low Productivity: Yields hover around 850–900 kg/ha, well below the global average of 1,200–1,300 kg/ha due to rain-fed dependence and input gaps.
  • Import Dependence: India imported ~2.8–3 million tonnes annually (2022–24); FY25 imports may touch 6.5–6.8 million tonnes, with yellow peas forming ~30%.
  • Price Volatility: In bumper years, market prices often fall 20–30% below MSP, discouraging cultivation.
  • Processing Deficit: Less than 10% of output is processed near farm gates, eroding farmers’ price share.

Roadmap to Self-Reliance

  • 1,000 Pulse Mills: Up to ₹25 lakh subsidy per unit for decentralised milling, cutting transport costs and creating jobs.
  • Farmer Incentives: Quality seed kits plus ₹10,000/ha assistance for model farming in clusters.
  • Targeted R&D: Yield gains in chana, tur, urad, moong, and lentil through pest-resistant, short-duration varieties.
  • Cooperative Federalism: States to prepare agro-climatic roadmaps aligned with national goals.

Strategic Significance

Achieving pulse self-reliance will strengthen food and nutritional security, stabilise prices, reduce import bills, and make Indian agriculture more climate-smart.

If implemented with predictable MSP procurement, assured markets, and robust extension services, the Mission can convert India’s protein deficit into a protein dividend.

Farmer Suicides in India: Patterns, Causes and Policy Gap

Context: A 28-year analysis of NCRB data (1995–2023) reveals that farmer suicides in India remain a persistent, regionally concentrated crisis, with a sharp resurgence in 2023 after nearly a decade of decline. The pattern underscores deep structural vulnerabilities in Indian agriculture that welfare measures have only partially mitigated.

image 8

Scale and Long-Term Trends

Between 1995 and 2023, about 3.94 lakh farmers and agricultural labourers died by suicide—an average of ~13,600 deaths annually. The crisis peaked during 2000–2009, accounting for nearly 1.54 lakh deaths, with 2002 recording the highest single-year toll (17,971).

After 2010, suicides declined steadily, coinciding with expanded rural wage employment. However, 2023 marked a reversal, with 10,786 suicides, a ~75% jump over 2022. Notably, the profile has shifted: agricultural labourers (6,096) now outnumber cultivators (4,690), signalling distress beyond landholding farmers.

Regional Concentration

The crisis is geographically skewed. Maharashtra (4,151) and Karnataka (2,423) together accounted for the largest share in 2023. Over the long term, southern and western India contribute ~72.5% of total farmer suicides.

Andhra Pradesh and Telangana together have recorded ~1.7 lakh deaths over 28 years, reflecting chronic vulnerability in rainfed, cash-crop-dependent regions.

Role of Welfare Interventions

Post-2010 declines align with welfare expansion, especially MGNREGA, which provided alternative income during agrarian stress. Some states demonstrated sharp turnarounds: Kerala reduced suicides from 1,118 (2005) to 105 (2014), and West Bengal reported zero cases by 2012—highlighting the importance of income smoothing and social protection.

Structural Drivers of Distress

  • Rainfed Vulnerability: ~52% of India’s net sown area is rainfed, disproportionately linked to suicides.
  • Debt Trap: ~50% of agricultural households are indebted; average debt exceeds ₹74,000.
  • Trade Exposure: Post-1990s liberalisation reduced income support amid rising import competition.
  • Input Cost Inflation: Fertiliser, seed, and pesticide costs rose >300% since the early 2000s, while real farm incomes stagnated.

Way Forward

  • Income Assurance: Expand MSP procurement beyond rice–wheat; pilot price-deficiency payments.
  • Risk Protection: Reform PM Fasal Bima Yojana with automatic, weather-triggered payouts.
  • Rainfed Resilience: Scale integrated farming systems (millets–pulses–livestock) under NICRA in cotton belts.
  • Labour Security: Stabilise wages for agricultural labourers; replicate Kerala’s Ayyankali Employment Guarantee during lean seasons.

India’s Shift from GM to Genome-Edited Crops

Context: India’s genetically modified (GM) crop progress has remained stagnant since the approval of Bt cotton in 2006. However, genome-edited (GE) crops have advanced rapidly due to regulatory relaxation, indigenous scientific tools, and rising public acceptance. This marks a major policy and technological shift in India’s approach to agricultural biotechnology.

Understanding Gene Editing

Gene editing modifies native genes within a plant without inserting foreign DNA.
It uses two key components:

  • Protein “scissors” to cut DNA at a targeted site
  • Guide RNA to direct the scissors precisely

This method mimics natural mutations and is therefore seen as safer, faster, and more predictable than traditional genetic modification.

How Gene Editing Differs from GMOs

1. Foreign DNA vs Native DNA

  • GMOs introduce genes from other species (transgenic).
  • GE crops alter only the plant’s own genes; no foreign DNA is added.

2. Regulatory Burden

  • GMOs require extensive biosafety, environmental, and GEAC-level approvals.
  • GE crops undergo simpler clearance through Institutional Biosafety Committees (IBCs), provided no foreign DNA remains.

3. Technological Pathway

  • GMOs rely on gene insertion into random genome locations.
  • GE techniques like CRISPR–Cas9, Cas12a, and TnpB create precise, site-specific edits.

4. Market Landscape

  • GM technology is dominated by large multinational corporations.
  • Gene editing democratises innovation, enabling public research institutions and small biotech labs to develop new varieties.

India’s Progress in Genome-Edited (GE) Crops

Indian research institutions have developed multiple GE lines:

1. GE Rice

  • Samba Mahsuri (High Yield)
  • MTU-1010 (Alkalinity Tolerance)

2. GE Mustard

  • Low-pungency, canola-quality mustard developed through targeted gene edits.

3. Editing Tools in Use

  • CRISPR–Cas9: drought and salinity tolerance
  • CRISPR–Cas12a: editing Gn1a gene for spikelet proliferation and higher yields
  • TnpB Miniature Gene Editor: an indigenous, patent-free, low-cost precision tool

Why GE Crops Are Succeeding Faster in India

1. Simplified Regulation

  • GE crops bypass GEAC if proven free of foreign DNA, reducing delays and costs.

2. Higher Public Acceptance

  • Absence of external genes reduces the controversy associated with GMOs.

3. Lower R&D Costs

  • CRISPR-based edits are economical and accessible to Indian labs.

4. Indigenous Innovation

  • India’s TnpB-based editor reduces reliance on expensive foreign technologies.

5. Targeted Government Support

  • The government allocated ₹500 crore (2023–24) exclusively for GE crop research.

6. Export Benefits

  • Countries like Japan and Australia allow GE food imports without GM labelling, supporting India’s agri-export potential.

Key Regulatory Bodies

Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC)

  • Apex body under MoEFCC for environmental release of GM organisms.

Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC)

  • Verifies that gene-edited crops contain no foreign DNA and ensures biosafety compliance under DBT norms.

Conclusion

India’s transition from GM to genome-edited crops marks a strategic evolution in agricultural biotechnology. With regulatory clarity, indigenous tools, and strong research momentum, GE crops offer the potential for higher yields, climate resilience, and reduced input costs—positioning India for the next phase of sustainable agricultural innovation.

Agriculture and Carbon Markets

Context: Agricultural carbon projects in India are increasingly being promoted to unlock new income opportunities for farmers while contributing to climate mitigation. However, concerns related to measurement accuracy, credibility of carbon credits, and benefit-sharing remain major constraints limiting wider participation.

image 7

What are Carbon Markets?

Carbon markets allow the buying and selling of carbon credits generated through emission-reduction or carbon-sequestration activities. They incentivise individuals, industries, and farmers to adopt low-carbon practices.

Significance of Carbon Markets in Agriculture

  • Income Diversification
    Climate-friendly practices—such as reduced tillage, agroforestry, and methane-reducing livestock solutions—enable farmers to earn carbon credits. India’s voluntary carbon credit potential is projected at US$20–40 billion by 2030.
  • Climate Mitigation
    Agriculture contributes significantly to methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Improved soil practices boost soil organic carbon, supporting India’s climate commitments under the Paris Agreement.
  • Global Market Presence
    India registered over 240 agri-food carbon projects under international standards by 2024, strengthening its role in the global voluntary carbon market.

Record Foodgrain Output 2024 –25: India Achieves Highest-Ever Production

Context: India has recorded its highest-ever foodgrain output in 2024–25, registering nearly 8% growth over the previous year. This marks one of the strongest agricultural performance phases in the last decade, supported by MSP-backed procurement, technological adoption, and favourable monsoon patterns.

Key Highlights of the Record Output

1. Total Foodgrain Production

  • Foodgrain output reached 357.73 million tonnes (MT).
  • This marks a rise of 106 MT over 2015–16, reflecting sustained long-term productivity gains.

2. Rice

  • Record production of 1501.84 lakh tonnes.
  • Increased by 123.59 lakh tonnes over 2023–24 due to improved paddy acreage and better kharif rainfall.

3. Wheat

  • Output climbed to 1179.45 lakh tonnes, a 46.53 lakh tonne increase over last year.
  • Supported by high-yield varieties and improved irrigation access.

4. Pulses

  • Production rose to 256.83 lakh tonnes, led by:
    • Chickpea (Chana): 111.14 lakh tonnes
    • Moong: 42.44 lakh tonnes
  • Mission-based interventions helped expand pulse acreage and reduce import reliance.

5. Coarse Cereals

  • Total production: 639.21 lakh tonnes, with maize alone at 434.09 lakh tonnes.
  • Growth driven by diversification and rising demand for feed and ethanol blending.

6. Oilseeds

  • Record 429.89 lakh tonnes, mainly due to:
    • Soybean: 152.68 lakh tonnes
    • Groundnut: 119.42 lakh tonnes
  • Reflects the success of oilseed missions and wider use of improved varieties.

7. Commercial Crops

  • Sugarcane: 4546.11 lakh tonnes
  • Cotton: 297.24 lakh bales
  • Jute: 88.02 lakh bales

Drivers Behind the Record Production

1. MSP-Backed Expansion

  • Strong procurement support raised farmer confidence.
  • Example: PM-AASHA bolstered tur–urad procurement, aiding pulse expansion.

2. Mission-Mode Productivity Gains

  • Oilseed and pulse missions improved seed varieties, extension services, and input access.
  • Example: Self-Reliance in Pulses Mission strengthened chana & moong yield.

3. Technological Adoption

  • Hybrid seeds, biofertilisers, mechanisation, and drone-based nutrient spraying raised per-acre productivity.
  • Supported by the Sub-Mission on Seeds & Planting Material (SMSP).

4. Better Water Management

  • PMKSY – Per Drop More Crop expanded micro-irrigation and watershed projects, stabilising yields.

5. Crop Diversification

  • Higher acreage in maize, soybean, mustard, and sugarcane boosted overall output.
  • Supported by the National Food Security Mission (NFSM).

6. Favourable Monsoon

  • IMD reported normal rainfall pockets in key kharif regions during 2024, aiding rice, pulses, and oilseeds.

Significance of the Record Harvest

  • Food Security Strengthened: FCI + state stocks exceed 500 lakh tonnes.
  • Reduced Import Dependence: Lower edible oil (₹1–1.3 lakh crore) and pulse import bills.
  • Higher Farmer Income: Chana procurement up 20–25%; coarse cereals also saw strong purchases.
  • Inflation Control: Increased supply helps moderate CPI Food Inflation (~45% weight).
  • Export Boost: Surplus maize, rice, oilseeds lifted agri-exports by 6.7% in H1 FY25.
  • Climate Resilience: Millet area rose >5%, strengthening adaptation capacity.

Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN): Latest Updates and Achievements

Context: Prime Minister Narendra Modi has released the 21st instalment of the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN) scheme during an event in Tamil Nadu. The instalment continues the government’s ongoing effort to ensure direct income support to farming households across India.

About the PM-KISAN Scheme

Launched in 2019 (with retrospective effect from December 2018), PM-KISAN is a central sector scheme providing income support to landholding farmer families across the country.

image 24

Objectives

  • To provide unconditional financial assistance to farmers.
  • To support farmers in meeting agricultural input costs and household needs.
  • To help reduce dependence on informal credit and moneylenders.

Nodal Ministry

The scheme is implemented by the Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare (DA&FW) under the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare.

Financial Benefits

  • ₹6,000 per year per eligible farmer family.
  • Transferred in three equal instalments of ₹2,000 every four months.
  • Delivered through Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) to ensure transparency and leakage-free delivery.

Eligibility and Exclusions

Eligible:

  • All landholding farmer families, irrespective of land size.

Excluded categories:

  • Institutional landholders
  • Active or former Ministers, MPs/MLAs, government officers
  • Income-tax payers
  • Professionals such as doctors, architects, engineers (if filing IT returns)

Beneficiary identification is done by the State/UT governments based on land records.

Technology Integration

PM-KISAN is one of India’s most digitally streamlined welfare schemes:

  • Aadhaar-based e-KYC for authentication
  • PM-KISAN Portal & Mobile App for real-time tracking
  • AI Chatbot—Kisan-eMitra for queries, registration support, and grievance redressal
  • Analytics for detecting duplicate or ineligible beneficiaries

Key Achievements

1. Financial Scale

  • Over ₹3.70 lakh crore disbursed directly into farmers’ bank accounts.
  • More than 11 crore farming families covered to date.

2. Inclusive Outreach

  • 85%+ small and marginal farmers are enrolled.
  • Women constitute over 25% of beneficiaries.

3. Coverage Expansion

Under the Viksit Bharat Sankalp Yatra, saturation campaigns added
1 crore new eligible farmer households to the scheme.

4. Governance Impact

  • Strengthened financial inclusion in rural areas.
  • Improved income stability for smallholders.
  • Enhanced transparency through DBT & digital verification.

Soil Organic Carbon: The Foundation of Soil Health

Context: A recent ICAR study has found that climate change and unbalanced fertiliser use are accelerating the decline of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) in India’s farmlands.
SOC is vital for soil fertility, water retention, and carbon sequestration — making it central to both food security and climate resilience.

Key Findings of the ICAR Study

  • SOC levels increase with elevation and decline with temperature, explaining higher carbon retention in hilly regions compared to plains.
  • Haryana, Punjab, and western Uttar Pradesh show the highest decline due to overuse of urea and phosphorus-based fertilisers.
  • Low SOC is directly linked to micronutrient deficiency and declining crop yields.

Understanding Soil Organic Carbon

  • SOC is the carbon component of soil organic matter, accounting for 50–60% of its weight.
  • Healthy soils contain 1–6% SOC, derived from decomposed plants, roots, and microbes.
  • SOC is the key determinant of soil fertility, microbial activity, and moisture retention.

Determinants of SOC

  • Temperature: Cooler regions retain more carbon; warmer climates accelerate decomposition.
  • Rainfall: Moderate rainfall aids vegetation growth; arid zones lose carbon through erosion.
  • Soil Texture: Clay soils preserve carbon better than sandy soils.
  • Vegetation Type: Grasslands and forests differ in carbon storage patterns.
  • Topography: Slopes lose SOC due to erosion, while valleys accumulate it.

Benefits of High SOC

  1. Improves soil structure and resistance to erosion.
  2. Enhances nutrient availability and microbial balance.
  3. Increases water retention and irrigation efficiency.
  4. Acts as a carbon sink, mitigating climate change.
  5. Reduces dependence on chemical fertilisers.

Factors Reducing SOC

  • Intensive tillage and residue burning.
  • Overuse of chemical fertilisers.
  • Deforestation and land-use change.
  • Warming temperatures and soil erosion.

Way Forward

  • Promote organic manures, composting, and biochar.
  • Encourage no-till and cover cropping practices.
  • Introduce carbon farming incentives and carbon credit markets.
  • Develop soil carbon monitoring systems under ICAR–NBSS&LUP.
  • Integrate SOC management into National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA).

Conclusion

Soil Organic Carbon is the lifeline of Indian agriculture.

Its conservation is not just an agronomic necessity but a climate imperative — essential for restoring soil vitality, ensuring food security, and achieving India’s carbon neutrality goals.

WEF Report: Deep-Tech Revolution in Agriculture

Context: The World Economic Forum (WEF) has released its report titled “Shaping the Deep-Tech Revolution in Agriculture” under its Artificial Intelligence for Agriculture Initiative (AI4AI).
The report explores how the convergence of deep technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Robotics, IoT, CRISPR, and Nanotechnology can transform global agriculture into a sustainable, resilient, and climate-smart sector.

Why Agriculture Needs Deep-Tech Intervention

Agriculture contributes nearly 18% of India’s GDP and supports more than 40% of employment, yet faces multiple structural and environmental challenges:

  • Low productivity: Yield gaps of 30–50% compared to global averages.
  • Resource depletion: Over 70% groundwater exploited; soil fertility declining.
  • Climate stress: Unpredictable rainfall, heatwaves, and pest attacks.
  • Labour shortages: Rural outmigration and ageing farm population.
  • Food security: Global demand expected to rise by 70% by 2050.

In this context, deep technologies offer solutions that go beyond conventional agri-tech — enabling predictive, precise, and sustainable agriculture.

Seven Deep-Tech Domains Transforming Agriculture

  1. Generative AI: Creates predictive models for sowing, pest management, and yield forecasting. It helps farmers make real-time decisions and avoid losses.
    Example: AI tools predicting locust swarms or monsoon onset patterns.
  2. Computer Vision: Identifies crop diseases, weed density, and fruit ripeness through image recognition — improving grading and reducing spoilage.
  3. Robotics & Drones: Automate labour-intensive operations like seeding, spraying, and harvesting.
    Example: Drones under PMFBY assist in faster crop loss assessment and data gathering.
  4. Edge IoT (Internet of Things): Sensor networks monitor soil moisture, nutrients, and weather conditions even in areas with poor connectivity.
  5. Remote Sensing & Satellites: Track farm health, vegetation indices, and carbon content, aiding precision irrigation and insurance validation.
  6. CRISPR and Gene Editing: Develop drought- and pest-resistant crops and bioengineered seeds with higher productivity.
    Example: ICAR-developed CRISPR rice varieties yield 30% more with lower methane emissions.
  7. Nanotechnology: Enables targeted nutrient and pesticide delivery, reduces input wastage, and prevents soil degradation.

The Convergence Model: How Deep-Tech Works Together

Deep-tech’s transformative impact emerges when these technologies integrate:

  • Swarm Robotics: Groups of AI-guided micro-robots performing weeding or planting collaboratively.
  • Precision Farm Management: Combining sensor, satellite, and AI data for optimal fertiliser-water balance.
  • Agentic AI: Self-learning systems autonomously plan cropping cycles and manage logistics.
  • Carbon Intelligence: AI-driven carbon mapping enables farmers to earn carbon credits under climate finance mechanisms.

Global and Indian Case Studies

  • Singapore: Uses AI-based hydroponic systems for urban food security.
  • Netherlands: Employs sensor-driven greenhouse farming to triple productivity.
  • India:
    • Digital Infrastructure for Farmers (DIF) initiative promotes AI and IoT integration.
    • Bhashini platform provides AI farm tools in local languages.
    • Startups like Fasal, CropIn, and DeHaat are leveraging AI for precision advisory.
    • PM-Kisan Drone Centres are being established for crop monitoring and spraying efficiency.

Economic and Environmental Potential

  • Yield Gains: Deep-tech could increase average crop productivity by 20–30%.
  • Water Savings: IoT irrigation can cut water use by up to 40%.
  • Carbon Reduction: Precision input application lowers GHG emissions by 15–25%.
  • Market Efficiency: Real-time supply chain analytics can reduce post-harvest loss by 20%.
  • Job Creation: The agri-tech sector can generate 5–7 million skilled jobs in AI, data analytics, and robotics by 2030.

Barriers to Adoption

  • High Cost: Equipment like drones and precision sensors remain unaffordable for smallholders.
  • Data Gaps: Inconsistent farm-level data limits model accuracy.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Gene editing (CRISPR) and nanotech still face approval delays.
  • Skill Deficiency: Low digital literacy in rural areas hampers adoption.
  • Environmental Risks: Need for long-term studies on nanomaterial toxicity.

Policy and Institutional Framework Needed

  1. Regulatory Sandbox for Agri-Tech: Enable pilot testing of AI, IoT, and gene-editing applications under controlled conditions.
  2. National Deep-Tech Mission for Agriculture: Similar to IndiaAI Mission, focusing on deep-tech in agri R&D.
  3. Data Infrastructure: Create unified agricultural data repositories under the Agristack initiative to support AI models.
  4. Public–Private Partnerships: Incentivise collaboration among start-ups, ICAR, and agri-businesses for scale-up.
  5. Financial Inclusion: Introduce concessional credit and insurance for farmers adopting tech-based solutions.
  6. Skill Development: Launch Agri-Tech Fellows programs and curricula on AI in agricultural universities.
  7. Ethical Framework: Define safety, privacy, and environmental standards for deep-tech deployment.

Way Forward

India stands at a critical juncture to lead the deep-tech revolution in agriculture, combining its digital infrastructure, start-up ecosystem, and scientific expertise.

By integrating AI-driven innovation with smallholder empowerment, India can not only enhance productivity but also achieve sustainable, climate-resilient, and inclusive growth in its agricultural sector.

Conclusion

The WEF’s report reinforces that the next phase of agricultural transformation will be data-driven and intelligence-led.

Deep-tech will redefine Indian agriculture from “input-intensive” to “knowledge-intensive.”

For UPSC aspirants and policymakers alike, it underlines how technology can bridge the gaps of productivity, sustainability, and resilience — shaping the future of food systems.

Reimagining Agriculture: NITI Aayog’s Frontier Technology Roadmap

Context: NITI Aayog has released its strategic report titled “Reimagining Agriculture: A Roadmap for Frontier Technology-Led Transformation” at Gandhinagar, Gujarat. The roadmap has been prepared in collaboration with the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Google, and the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), signaling a strong public–private partnership approach.

image 10

Why This Roadmap?

Indian agriculture, while central to livelihoods and food security, is at a crossroads:

  • It contributes ~18% to GDP but supports ~43% of India’s workforce.
  • 86% of farmers are small and marginal, with limited access to credit, mechanisation, or market linkages.
  • Productivity remains 30–40% lower than global averages, and 50% of farmland is rainfed, increasing vulnerability to climate change.

To address these structural challenges, the roadmap proposes a technology-integrated, farmer-centric transformation.

Key Features of the Roadmap

1. Digital Agriculture Mission 2.0

A Three-Pillar Strategy:

  1. Data Ecosystems – Unified digital crop and land records.
  2. Innovation Systems – R&D and scalable pilot solutions.
  3. Policy Convergence – Alignment of central, state and industry reforms.

2. Frontier Technology Integration

  • AI and Remote Sensing for real-time crop advisory and disaster prediction.
  • Precision Farming Tools such as IoT-based soil sensors, drones and satellite imaging.
  • Smart Mechanisation to reduce manual labour dependency.

3. Farmer-Centric Segmentation Model

The roadmap recognises diversity among Indian farmers and tailors support accordingly:

Farmer SegmentShareStrategy
Aspiring (70–80%)Small/MarginalInput support + advisory services
Transitioning (15–20%)Mid-scale growersCredit & tech access for expansion
Advanced (1–2%)Commercial farmersMarket & export integration

State Leadership and Institutional Role

  • Gujarat highlighted as a model with initiatives like the Digital Crop Survey and i-Khedut Portal, improving transparency in subsidies and land records.
  • Implementation led by NITI Aayog’s Frontier Technology Hub, ensuring collaboration between startups, research institutions and state governments.

Alignment with Viksit Bharat 2047

The roadmap envisions:

  • Higher farm incomes
  • Climate-resilient agriculture
  • Data-driven decision-making
  • Strong domestic agri-tech ecosystems

This marks a strategic shift from input-intensive to knowledge and innovation-driven farming.

Conclusion

The roadmap offers a pragmatic and future-ready vision for Indian agriculture. If implemented effectively, it can enhance productivity, reduce climate vulnerability and empower farmers through technology-driven autonomy — paving the way towards a self-reliant and globally competitive agricultural economy.

Stubble Burning in Punjab – A Persistent Challenge

Context (TH, 2025): With the paddy harvesting season underway in Punjab, stubble burning has re-emerged as a significant environmental and public health concern. Despite a visible decline in the number of recorded fire incidents, the total burnt area remains largely unchanged, reflecting the deep-rooted structural and economic issues behind the practice.

Why Do Farmers Continue to Burn Stubble?

  1. Short Cropping Window:
    Farmers have only 20–25 days between paddy harvest (late October) and wheat sowing (mid-November). This limited time forces them to resort to burning for rapid field clearing. (Punjab Agricultural University, 2024)
  2. Labour Shortage:
    Mechanisation and rural migration have reduced the agricultural workforce by ~45% over the past decade. (NITI Aayog, 2023)
  3. High Machinery Cost:
    Machines like the Happy Seeder and Super Straw Management System (SMS) cost between ₹1.5–2 lakh, which remains unaffordable for smallholders even after 50–80% subsidy.
  4. Fragmented Landholdings:
    Small and fragmented farms (average size 1.9 ha in Punjab, 1.4 ha in Haryana) make residue management uneconomical. (Agricultural Census, 2021)
  5. Weak Enforcement:
    While penalties are prescribed under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, enforcement is lax due to socio-political sensitivities at the local level.

Environmental and Health Impacts

  • Stubble burning contributes up to 35–45% of Delhi-NCR’s winter PM2.5 levels.
  • Releases CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O, aggravating climate change.
  • Causes smog, respiratory illness, and soil nutrient depletion.

Way Forward

In-situ Management:
Promote Happy Seeder and Super SMS through Custom Hiring Centres (CHCs) under ICAR’s Crop Residue Management Scheme.

Ex-situ Utilisation:
Divert paddy straw to biogas, paper, and biomass power plants. Under the SATAT Scheme, India aims to set up 5000 Compressed Biogas plants.

Direct Incentives:
Provide ₹2000–₹3000 per acre to farmers avoiding residue burning. Pilot programs in Sangrur and Patiala reduced fire incidents by 60%.

Behavioural Change:
Campaigns like “No Burn November” and school-based awareness drives are essential to shift community behaviour.

Digital Monitoring:
Integrate MODIS, VIIRS, and Sentinel-2 satellite data with on-ground verification for real-time fire mapping. (PGIMER Chandigarh, 2025)

Conclusion:

While policy interventions have made progress, long-term sustainability requires a blend of economic incentives, decentralised residue utilisation, and behavioural change, making stubble management a collective environmental responsibility.

Makhana: Bihar’s Superfood Economy and the Push for Value Addition

Context: Bihar, which produces nearly 90% of India’s makhana (foxnut), has recently become central to the government’s agricultural and rural development strategy. With rising global demand and growing recognition of makhana as a superfood, the crop holds unique economic and cultural significance, especially in the Mithilanchal region of Bihar.

Economic Significance

Makhana (botanical name: Euryale ferox) is primarily cultivated in the districts of Darbhanga, Madhubani, Purnea, and Katihar, which together contribute around 80% of Bihar’s production. Traditionally consumed during fasting and Ayurvedic diets, makhana has now gained mainstream popularity due to its high protein, low fat, and antioxidant-rich profile.

The global makhana market, valued at USD 43.56 million in 2023, is projected to double to USD 100 million by 2033, driven by rising health-consciousness and snack industry diversification. This positions makhana as a high-value export crop that can generate employment and entrepreneurship in rural Bihar.

Challenges in the Sector

Despite its potential, several structural issues limit farmer incomes and market development:

  1. Processing and Infrastructure Gaps: Bihar lacks sufficient food processing units (FPUs), cold-chain facilities, and export-oriented packaging centres. Large quantities of raw makhana are sold to processors in Punjab and Assam, where value addition and branding occur — leaving Bihar farmers with a low share of final profits.
  2. Weak Market Organisation: Small farmers depend on middlemen due to a lack of producer cooperatives or direct market access. The demand for Minimum Support Price (MSP) remains unresolved, emerging as a critical farmer welfare concern.
  3. Labour-Intensive and Costly Cultivation: Harvesting involves manual pond diving, shelling, and hand-roasting, making the process both time-consuming and expensive.
  4. Low Productivity Levels: Traditional cultivation methods yield only 1.7–1.9 tonnes/hectare, whereas improved varieties such as Swarna Vaidehi and Sabour Makhana-1 can increase yields to 3–3.5 tonnes/hectare with scientific practices.

Read also: Foxnuts (makhana) are in demand as a ‘super snack’

National Makhana Board

On 15th September, the Prime Minister launched the National Makhana Board in Purnea, Bihar, with a budget of ₹100 crore.
The Board aims to:

  • Enhance production through scientific farming and seed improvement
  • Strengthen processing, storage, and export infrastructure
  • Facilitate training and capacity building for farmers and self-help groups
  • Improve market linkages and reduce intermediaries

A planned Food Processing Institute in the region is expected to serve as a hub for innovation, skilling, entrepreneurship, and the development of makhana-based product lines such as snacks, health mixes, and nutraceuticals.

Conclusion

Makhana represents a strategic opportunity to link traditional livelihoods with modern value chains. With institutional support, improved production technologies, and stronger processing networks, Bihar can emerge as a global hub for high-quality makhana, boosting both farmer incomes and regional economic development.

Govt Raises MSP for Six Rabi Crops

Context: The Union Cabinet has approved significant hikes in the Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) for six rabi crops for the 2026–27 marketing season, aimed at ensuring remunerative prices to farmers and promoting crop diversification.

What is MSP?

  • MSP is the minimum guaranteed price at which the government procures crops from farmers, protecting them from distress sales.
  • It currently covers 23 crops: 7 cereals, 5 pulses, 7 oilseeds, and 4 commercial crops.
  • The policy serves as a tool for ensuring food security, farmer welfare, and market stability.

Key Highlights of the Hike

  • Crops Covered: Wheat, barley, jowar, gram, lentil, and safflower.
  • Wheat: MSP increased by ₹160 per quintal to ₹2,585/quintal (6.6% rise), offering the highest gain over cost of production (109%).
  • Safflower: Witnessed the highest absolute and percentage increase (₹600 per quintal), reflecting government emphasis on oilseed cultivation and crop diversification.
  • The hikes align with the government’s aim to double farmers’ income and reduce dependence on imported edible oils.
image 13

How MSP is Determined

  • Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP):
    • A statutory body set up in 1965 under the Ministry of Agriculture.
    • Recommends MSPs twice a year (for kharif and rabi crops).
    • Recommendations are not binding; final approval rests with the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA).
  • Factors Considered:
    • Cost of cultivation (A2, A2+FL, C2).
    • Demand-supply situation.
    • Price trends and inter-crop parity.
    • Terms of trade for farmers.
    • Global prices and food security concerns.
  • Cost Concepts:
    • A2: Actual paid-out costs (seeds, fertilizers, etc.).
    • A2+FL: A2 + imputed family labour.
    • C2: Comprehensive cost (A2+FL + rental value of land + interest on capital).
  • MSPs are generally fixed at A2+FL + 50% margin, ensuring fair returns.

Significance

  • Enhances farmers’ income security and incentivizes crop production.
  • Encourages oilseed production, reducing edible oil import bills.
  • Balances inflation control with farmer welfare.
  • Strengthens food security by ensuring procurement at fair prices.

Challenges Ahead

  • Procurement is still concentrated in wheat and rice, limiting benefits for other crops.
  • Rising MSPs can strain the fiscal burden.
  • Market reforms and diversification efforts need to complement MSP to achieve sustainable outcomes.

Conclusion

The recent MSP hike reflects the government’s continued focus on farmer welfare, crop diversification, and self-reliance in agriculture. However, structural reforms in procurement, storage, and marketing remain crucial to ensure that the benefits of MSP reach all farmers equitably.

Trending now

Taming the Algorithm: India’s New Rules for Regulating AI-Generated Content
China’s New Antarctic Law and Implications for Global Polar Governance
India–EU Deepen Partnership in Peaceful Nuclear Science and Fusion Energy
Solid Waste Management Rules, 2026: Strengthening India’s Waste Governance Framework