Institutionalising Equity on Campus: UGC’s New Anti-Discrimination Framework

Context: The University Grants Commission (UGC) has notified the Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions Regulations, 2026, replacing the earlier advisory framework with enforceable mechanisms to prevent discrimination across universities and colleges in India.

image 2

Why the New Regulations Were Needed

  • Rising Complaints: Caste-based discrimination complaints reported to UGC rose 118.4%, from 173 (2019–20) to 378 (2023–24).
  • Backlog Concerns: Pending cases increased from 18 to 108 during the same period, indicating recurring disputes and uneven resolution.
  • High-Profile Incidents: The Rohith Vemula (2016) and Payal Tadvi (2019) cases highlighted institutional failures and triggered demands for stronger safeguards.

Shift from the 2012 Regulations

  • Advisory → Enforceable: The 2012 regulations lacked penalties; the 2026 rules empower UGC to take binding action against non-compliant institutions.
  • Clear Procedures: Time-bound inquiry and appeal mechanisms introduced.
  • Expanded Coverage: OBCs explicitly included within caste-based discrimination.
  • Wider Definition: Covers explicit, implicit, indirect, and structural discrimination.

Key Institutional Mechanisms under the 2026 Regulations

1. Equal Opportunity Centre (EOC)

• Mandatory nodal body in every Higher Education Institution (HEI).
• Responsible for equity policy implementation and grievance coordination.

2. Equity Committee

• Inquiry body under EOC, chaired ex-officio by the Head of Institution.
• Includes faculty, non-teaching staff, civil-society members, and student representatives.
• Mandatory representation of SC, ST, OBC, women, and persons with disabilities.

3. Equity Squads

• Mobile vigilance teams to monitor vulnerable campus spaces and deter discriminatory practices.

4. Equity Ambassadors

• Designated nodal persons in departments, hostels, libraries, and common facilities to promote equity awareness and reporting.

5. 24×7 Equity Helpline

• Confidential, round-the-clock grievance access.
• Serious cases may be linked to law-enforcement where penal provisions apply.

6. Ombudsperson

• Independent appellate authority to review Equity Committee decisions and issue binding directions.

Complaint Handling Process

Multiple Channels: Online portal, email, written complaints, and helpline.
Fast Timelines:
– Committee must convene within 24 hours of complaint receipt.
– Inquiry report to be submitted within 15 working days.
Appeal: Ombudsperson review within 30 days.

Concerns Raised

¬ Absence of explicit safeguards against false or malicious complaints.
¬ Risks of reputational harm to accused during inquiries.
¬ Compressed timelines may affect procedural fairness.
¬ Potential chilling effect on academic freedom due to police linkage.

Way Forward

  • Issue clear evidentiary thresholds and interpretative guidelines.
  • Ensure confidentiality protections during inquiry stages.
  • Provide capacity-building training for Equity Committees.
  • Allow graded timelines in complex cases to ensure due process.

Conclusion

The UGC Anti-Discrimination Regulations, 2026 mark a decisive move from symbolic compliance to institutional accountability. If implemented with procedural safeguards, they can significantly strengthen social justice and trust within India’s higher-education ecosystem.

Share this with friends ->

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 20 MB. You can upload: image, document, archive. Drop files here

Discover more from Compass by Rau's IAS

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading