- No legal force: They were described as ‘pious superfluities’ and was compared to a blank cheque, new year’s resolutions, manifestation of aims and aspirations.
- Illogically arranged: DPSP have been criticized for being arranged in an illogical manner and without any consistent philosophy.
- Conservative and orthodox: Some provisions are outdated and are not consistent with 21st century philosophies. Ex: Banning intoxicating drinks
- Might lead to confusion and conflicts.
- Can cause conflicts between centre and states during implementation of DPSP.
- Constitutional cases were high during the initial stages concerning the conflicts between FRs and DPSP
NCRWC Recommendations:
The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution recommended:
- A strategic plan of action to create a large number of employments opportunities.
- Setting up a National Education Commission every five years to report on compulsory education.
- Promoting through civil society initiatives interfaith and inter- religious harmony and social solidarity.
- Establishing a high-status body to review the implementation of Directive Principles.